Pyrotechnics: The History and Art of Firework Making — John Shaqi
Pyrotechnics: The History and Art of Firework MakingBrock, Alan St. H. (Alan St. Hill)
History
Pyrotechnics: The History and Art of Firework Making
Brock, Alan St. H. (Alan St. Hill)
Fireworks
The date of this work is a subject of controversy; some writers place
it as early as the eighth century, and it can only be said with
certainty that it is not later than 1280. The latter date is fixed by
the death of Albertus Magnus, who, in his book “De miribilibus mundi,”
from internal evidence, is obviously plagiarising the Liber Ignium.
Friar Roger Bacon (1214–94), in two of his works, refers at least twice
to compositions containing saltpetre, powdered charcoal, and sulphur.
In one place he refers to fires that “shall burn at what distance we
please”; in another to “thunder and corruscations,” which references
seem to suggest that he is describing something of a pyrotechnic nature
rather than the simple effect of gunpowder. His description in no way
indicates that he claimed to be the inventor, but rather as something
well known before.
Dr. Jebb, in his preface to Bacon’s “Opus Majus,” refers to what seems
to be an early example of both the rocket and the cracker.
Dutens, in his “Inquiries into the Origin of the discoveries attributed
to the Moderns” (1790), makes reference to many early writers, which
are mostly so vague and exaggerated that no definite conclusion can be
drawn from them; most refer to the early uses of Greek-fire or similar
composition.
Don Pedro, Bishop of Leon, says that “in 1343, in a sea combat between
the King of Tunis and the Moorish King of Seville ... those of Tunis
had certain iron tubes or barrels wherewith they threw thunderbolts of
fire.”
This description, if accurate, may be thought to suggest the use of
cannons, but it is more likely to refer to the use of Greek-fire;
this composition will, in certain proportions, if charged into a
strong tube, give intermittent bursts, projecting blazing masses of
the mixture to a considerable distance. The writer has seen this
effect produced in a steel mortar of 5½ inches diameter, the masses of
composition being thrown a distance of upwards of a hundred yards, a
considerable range in the days of close warfare. Anyone who has seen
this phenomenon will at once realise that here probably is the true
solution of many obscure early references to explain which so much
ingenuity has been expended.
An interesting fact which seems to have escaped the notice of writers
on this subject is that Theresa, daughter of Alfonso V. King of Leon
and the Asturias (A.D. 999), when married to Abdallah, King of Toledo,
took for device on her coat of arms a mortar in which a powder is being
pounded. This powder is supposed to represent gunpowder, a supposition
which is supported by the motto, “Minima maxima fecit” (A little makes
much). If gunpowder is intended, this must be one of the earliest
references to its quality of exploding, and it is difficult to explain
the meaning otherwise.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account