He fared better in the education of his mental faculties. His parents' home was a calm retreat where thought, judgment and refinement had their abode, and the noise of mob and cannon and politics scarcely penetrated. It was an artists' home, frequented by artists, English as well as French. Here was leisure and disposition to consider the value of an idea. And here was laid the foundation of that varied education of which he gives evidence in the many-sidedness of his interests and of his literary activity. But although this quiet life in the society of artists and scholars, quite shut in from the world of politics, was conducive to the development of a refined mind, it is evident that participation in events would have been better for the development of Mérimée's will. Besides, he was humored at home, was not put to definite and perhaps disagreeable tasks. Another unfavorable influence was the reaction--after Waterloo--from the extreme energy of Napoleonic times, bringing about in France a general feeling of lassitude and vague fear. This may explain to some extent why Mérimée very rarely gave himself completely to a cause and why he appeared to the world as a sceptic and a dilettante. We must think then of Mérimée as a man of exceptionally complex and refined mind, capable of deep feeling, but rarely showing it, and strongly inclined towards dilettantism. During the first ten years of his early manhood Mérimée divided his time between literary studies and pleasure, taking upon himself no definite responsibilities. He began the study of law, but he soon abandoned it. In 1826 he took a trip to England, in 1829 he went to Spain. Between 1831 and 1833 he was, according to his own account, a "_mauvais sujet_ with moderation and from curiosity". In the mean time he acquired a rather profound knowledge of Greek and of Latin. He also began to study Spanish and learned to speak not only the pure Castilian, but several of its dialects as well. History, too, began to have a great charm for him, especially in the form of the concrete anecdote. He declares in one of his early books, the "Chronique du règne de Charles IX", that history is but a series of anecdotes and that he would have preferred the memoirs of one of Pericles' chambermaids to the "History of the Peloponnesian War". He also becomes acquainted with the thinkers and literary men of the day, young men most of them, such as Albert Stapfer, Henri Beyle, Sainte-Beuve, Viollet-le-Duc, Victor Hugo, and others, some of whom achieved lasting fame. Many of these would meet regularly, read their work to each other and discuss Byron, Walter Scott and Goethe. Mérimée would then sit sketching at a corner of the table, and would utter from time to time his droll, shrewd witticism, quietly, without a smile, and without making any effort to see whether his "mot" had hit the mark.