Quo vadimus? : $b Some glimpses of the future — John Shaqi
Quo vadimus? : $b Some glimpses of the futureFournier d'Albe, E. E. (Edmund Edward)
Philosophy
Quo vadimus? : $b Some glimpses of the future
Fournier d'Albe, E. E. (Edmund Edward)
Civilization; Progress
Without such a danger from without, the close federation of the nations
of the world is almost unthinkable. Take the case of Ireland. There
we have two nationalities in one island, as opposed to each other as
any two nations in the same continent. In the North, a hardy, stern,
rough and unbending type of Scottish origin, who despises the “natives”
of Ireland as an inferior race, and makes good by converting a large
slice of the “distressful country” into a garden of prosperity. In
the South, a graceful and indolent peasant race, with all the mingled
diffidence and bravado of a conquered people largely pervaded by the
blood of its conquerors, and imbued with the idea of martyrdom for the
twin ideas of religion and nationality (in this case, as it happens,
quite incompatible). How can anyone expect peace under such conditions?
The situation is the very stuff that ruthless wars are made of. The
Ulsterman will not “go under” a Dublin parliament run by what he
considers to be ignorant cornerboys. The Munsterman looks upon the
“blaack Praatestant” of the North as dirt, which Ireland must disgorge
before she can rise to the height of her destiny. England, with her
good-natured religious and ethnical tolerance, is despised by both
parties, though the Ulsterman clings passionately to the empire, which
he provides with the largest ships afloat.
That sort of thing makes international tribunals and Leagues of Nations
look ridiculous. Here are two populations in a small island, ready to
rend each other limb from limb on the slightest excuse because the
country is not large enough to hold both.
On the other hand, it is an undoubted fact that international trade,
finance, and intercourse has increased enormously with improved means
of transport. The Postal Union is a fine achievement towards the
unification of the whole human family. Its successful working shows
that enterprises covering the entire civilized population of the globe
can now be undertaken and carried through. It so happens that the two
greatest States of the world, the British Empire and the United States
of America, are also the States whose home countries are freest from
national intolerance and race prejudice, both consisting of a mixture
of many nationalities. It is to them, as well as France, that we must
look for the greatest advances towards the ideal of a world federation.
Germany before the War cherished dreams of World Supremacy, but lacked
the schooling which might have led to success.
The two great Empires――British and Japanese――and the two great
Republics――France and U.S.A.――will, if they can agree, form a good
nucleus for a federation of the world. The world, in its present state,
requires leadership, and if the leaders are a representative and
benevolent oligarchy, it is about the best we can hope for.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account