Race Distinctions in American LawStephenson, Gilbert Thomas
History
Race Distinctions in American Law
Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas
African Americans -- Politics and government; Law -- United States -- History; United States -- Race relations
G.G.F. G.G.M. G.G.F. G.G.M. G.G.F. G.G.M. G.G.F. G.G.M.
III A B C D E F G H
\ / \ / \ / \ /
\ / \ / \ / \ /
\/ \/ \/ \/
G.F. G.M. G.F. G.M.
II I J K L
\ / \ /
\ / \ /
\ / \ /
\ / \ /
\ / \ /
\ / \ /
I F M
M\ /N
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
X
Suppose it is desired to ascertain whether the son X is a white person
or a Negro. The first generation above him is that of his parents, M and
N. If either of them is white and the other a Negro, X has one-half
Negro blood and would be considered a Negro everywhere. The second
generation is that of his grandparents, I, J, K, and L. If any one of
them is a Negro and the other three white, X has one-fourth Negro blood,
and would be considered a Negro in every State except possibly Ohio. The
third generation is that of his great-grandparents, A, B, C, D, E, F, G,
and H. If any one of these eight great-grandparents is a Negro, X has
one-eighth Negro blood and would be considered a Negro in every State
which defines a person of color as one who has one-eighth Negro blood or
is descended from a Negro to the third generation inclusive. Suppose,
for instance, the great-grandfather A was a Negro and all the rest of
the great-grandparents were white. The grandfather I would be half
Negro; the father M would be one-fourth Negro; and X would be one-eighth
Negro. Thus, though of the fourteen progenitors of X only three had
Negro blood, X would nevertheless be considered a Negro.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account