Footnote 644: Thompson v. Texas, 1903, 74 S. W. 914. Footnote 645: McPherson v. McCarrick, 1900, 61 P. 1004. Footnote 646: Raleigh, N. C., _News and Observer_, Feb. 17, 1910. Footnote 647: Whitney v. Texas, 1901, 63 S. W. 879. Footnote 648: Laws of S. C., 1865, pp. 278–91; 1866, pp. 387–90. Footnote 649: Pace and Cox v. State, 1881, 69 Ala. 231. Footnote 650: Pace v. Ala., 1882, 106 U. S. 583. See also Ellis v. Ala., 1868, 42 Ala. 525; Lord v. Ala., 1875, 53 Ala. 150. Footnote 651: Laws of S. C., 1865, p. 271. Footnote 652: Laws of Fla., 1865, p. 24. Footnote 653: Laws of Ky., 1865–66, p. 42. Footnote 654: _Ibid._, 1869, p. 52. Footnote 655: Laws of Mo., 1903, p. 161. Footnote 656: Laws of Ky., 1904, p. 83. Footnote 657: Laws of Del., 1866–69, p. 161. Footnote 658: Laws of Miss., 1866–67, pp. 232–33. Footnote 659: Laws of S. C., 1866, p. 405. Footnote 660: Boston _Post_, May 22, 1909. The volume of New York reports containing this case is not yet accessible. It is referred to, however, in 117 N. Y. Sup., p. 116. CHAPTER XI SUFFRAGE The Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, ratified on March 30, 1870, reads: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” In the face of this unequivocal constitutional provision, it would seem impossible to have a legal race distinction in the matter of suffrage. It is plain that, if a State or the United States makes a law that in any way denies or abridges the right of a citizen to vote on account of his race, such an enactment is in violation of the Amendment. The only State or Federal statute or State constitutional provision involving a race distinction that would be valid under the Fifteenth Amendment would be one that did not amount to a denial or abridgment of the right to vote. For instance, a State might require white and Negro electors to cast their ballots in different boxes, or in different parts of the booth, or even in different booths; or it might require them to register on different days, or before different registrars. If the Negro was given the same opportunity to register and vote as the white man, the requirements of separate registering and balloting would be race distinctions in the matter of suffrage, but they would not be denials or abridgments of the right to vote and, hence, might be supported under the Fifteenth Amendment. Any such requirements have not been found in the State Constitutions or statutes; they are only suggested as possible race distinctions which might be permissible.