Race Distinctions in American LawStephenson, Gilbert Thomas
History
Race Distinctions in American Law
Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas
African Americans -- Politics and government; Law -- United States -- History; United States -- Race relations
It follows, therefore, that the race distinctions to be considered in
this chapter exist, not in conformity to law, as in the case of separate
schools and public conveyances, but in defiance of law or by legal
subterfuges, and are properly called discriminations.
NEGRO SUFFRAGE BEFORE 1865
The suffrage requirements as to race up to 1865 serve as a background
for the events after that date. A review[661] of the acts of territorial
government and State Constitutions of the Territories and States of the
United States reveals the following facts: Maine, Massachusetts, New
Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont appear not to have had any race
distinctions in suffrage. Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado,
Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan,
Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina,
and West Virginia never permitted any but white males to vote at any
time between the Revolution and 1865. The Constitutions of Kansas[662]
of 1855 and of Minnesota[663] of 1857 permitted civilized Indians to
vote, though the same privilege was not extended to Negroes.
Kentucky,[664] in 1799, gave the suffrage to “free” persons, but
expressly excepted Negroes, mulattoes, and Indians. Texas,[665] in 1845,
gave the right to vote to free male persons but excepted Indians not
taxed, Africans, and descendants of Africans.
Besides the above-named States which either made no race distinctions at
all or else always made distinctions as to Negroes, several States, at
one time or another, extended a limited suffrage to Negroes. The
Constitution of New York[666] of 1821, giving the right to vote to male
citizens, had the provision that “no man of color, unless he shall have
been for three years a citizen of this State, and for one year next
preceding any election shall be seized and possessed of a freehold
estate of the value of two hundred and fifty dollars, over and above all
debts and incumbrances charged thereon, and shall have been actually
rated and paid a tax thereon, shall be entitled to vote at any such
election.” There was no property test for white voters. The
Constitution[667] of 1846 had the same provision about Negro voters. The
question of equal suffrage to Negroes was submitted[668] separately in
1846, and rejected by a vote of 85,306 to 223,834. It was again
submitted in 1860, with like result, the vote being 197,503 to 337,984.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account