Race Distinctions in American Law

Name: Race Distinctions in American Law
Author: Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas

Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas

African Americans -- Politics and government; Law -- United States -- History; United States -- Race relations

_The American Political Science Review_, vol. 4, p. 63 (Feb., 1910).

Footnote 723:

  31 Stat. L., 82–83, chap. 191; Sixty-first Cong., 2d sess., H. Doc.
  No. 615; Congressional Record, vol. 45, p. 1199.

Footnote 724:

  Williams v. Miss., 1898, 170 U. S. 213, at p. 225.

Footnote 725:

  Mills v. Green, 1895, 159 U. S. 651; Jones v. Montague, 1904, 194 U.
  S. 147; Selden v. Montague, 1904, 194 U. S. 153; Giles v. Teasley,
  1904, 136 Ala. 164, and 193 U. S. 146; Giles v. Harris, 1903, 189 U.
  S. 475. For discussions of the constitutionality of the suffrage laws
  of the South see _The American Political Science Review_, vol. I, pp.
  17, _et seq._, and John Mabry Mathews: “History of the Fifteenth
  Amendment,” 1909, The Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 97–127.

Footnote 726:

  Mathews: History of the Fifteenth Amendment, pp. 125–26.

Footnote 727:

  Raleigh, N. C., _News and Observer_, Nov. 9, 1907; Feb. 24, 25, and
  28, 1909.

Footnote 728:

  See Poindexter v. Greenhow, 1884, 114 U. S. 270, at p. 304; and
  Spraigue v. Thompson, 1886, 118 U. S. 90, at p. 95.

Footnote 729:

  Laws of Md., 1910, chap. 253.

Footnote 730:

  _The Harvard Law Review_, vol. XXIII, p. 169.

Footnote 731:

  W. P. Pickett: The Negro Problem, pp. 259–84.

Footnote 732:

  Kirby’s Digest, 1904, sec. 2767.

Footnote 733:

  Const., 1880, art. II, sec. 1, as amended 1894.

Footnote 734:

  Const., 1876, art. VII, sec. 1, as amended 1893; Revised Stat., 1908,
  secs. 2027 and 2146–50.

Footnote 735:

  Const., 1818, art. VI, secs. 2 and 3, as amended 1897; General Stat.,
  1902, secs. 1593–94.

Footnote 736:

  Const., 1831, art. IV, sec. 1.

Footnote 737:

  Const., 1887, art. VI, sec. 1; General Stat., 1906, sec. 170.

Footnote 738:

  Const., 1889, art. VI, sec. 2.

Footnote 739:

  Const., 1870, art. VII, sec. 1.

Footnote 740:

  Const., 1851, art. II, secs. 84–85; Burns’s Stat., 1908, II, sec.
  6877.

Footnote 741:

  Const., 1881, art. II.

Footnote 742:

  Const., 1859, art. V.

Footnote 743:

  Const., 1891, sec. 145.

Footnote 744:

  Const., 1819, art. II, as amended 1893.

Footnote 745:

  Const., 1867, art. I, secs. 1–3.

Footnote 746:

  Const., 1780, as amended 1821 and 1857.

Footnote 747:

  Const., 1850, art. VII, secs. 1 and 8.

Footnote 748:

  Const., 1858, art. VII.

Footnote 749:

  Const., 1875, art. VIII, secs. 2, 8, 10, and 11.

Footnote 750:

  Const., 1889, art. IX.

Footnote 751:

  Const., 1866, art. VII.

Footnote 752:

  Const., 1864, art. II.

Footnote 753:

  Public Stat., 1901, pp. 136–37.

Footnote 754:

  Const., 1864, art. II.

Footnote 755:

  Const., 1894, art. II.

Footnote 756:

  Const., 1889, as amended, sec. 121.

Footnote 757:

  Const., 1851, art. V.

Footnote 758:

  Const., 1907, art. III.

Footnote 759:

  Const., 1859, art. II.

Footnote 760:

  Const., 1874, art. VIII.

Footnote 761:

  Const., 1842, as amended 1888, art. II.

Footnote 762:

  Const., 1889, art. VII.

Footnote 763:

  Const., 1870, art. IV.

Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.

Opening the text

Race Distinctions in American LawStephenson, Gilbert Thomas

History

Race Distinctions in American Law

Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas

African Americans -- Politics and government; Law -- United States -- History; United States -- Race relations

_The American Political Science Review_, vol. 4, p. 63 (Feb., 1910).

Footnote 723:

  31 Stat. L., 82–83, chap. 191; Sixty-first Cong., 2d sess., H. Doc.
  No. 615; Congressional Record, vol. 45, p. 1199.

Footnote 724:

  Williams v. Miss., 1898, 170 U. S. 213, at p. 225.

Footnote 725:

  Mills v. Green, 1895, 159 U. S. 651; Jones v. Montague, 1904, 194 U.
  S. 147; Selden v. Montague, 1904, 194 U. S. 153; Giles v. Teasley,
  1904, 136 Ala. 164, and 193 U. S. 146; Giles v. Harris, 1903, 189 U.
  S. 475. For discussions of the constitutionality of the suffrage laws
  of the South see _The American Political Science Review_, vol. I, pp.
  17, _et seq._, and John Mabry Mathews: “History of the Fifteenth
  Amendment,” 1909, The Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 97–127.

Footnote 726:

  Mathews: History of the Fifteenth Amendment, pp. 125–26.

Footnote 727:

  Raleigh, N. C., _News and Observer_, Nov. 9, 1907; Feb. 24, 25, and
  28, 1909.

Footnote 728:

  See Poindexter v. Greenhow, 1884, 114 U. S. 270, at p. 304; and
  Spraigue v. Thompson, 1886, 118 U. S. 90, at p. 95.

Footnote 729:

  Laws of Md., 1910, chap. 253.

Footnote 730:

  _The Harvard Law Review_, vol. XXIII, p. 169.

Footnote 731:

  W. P. Pickett: The Negro Problem, pp. 259–84.

Footnote 732:

  Kirby’s Digest, 1904, sec. 2767.

Footnote 733:

  Const., 1880, art. II, sec. 1, as amended 1894.

Footnote 734:

  Const., 1876, art. VII, sec. 1, as amended 1893; Revised Stat., 1908,
  secs. 2027 and 2146–50.

Footnote 735:

  Const., 1818, art. VI, secs. 2 and 3, as amended 1897; General Stat.,
  1902, secs. 1593–94.

Footnote 736:

  Const., 1831, art. IV, sec. 1.

Footnote 737:

  Const., 1887, art. VI, sec. 1; General Stat., 1906, sec. 170.

Footnote 738:

  Const., 1889, art. VI, sec. 2.

Footnote 739:

  Const., 1870, art. VII, sec. 1.

Footnote 740:

  Const., 1851, art. II, secs. 84–85; Burns’s Stat., 1908, II, sec.
  6877.

Footnote 741:

  Const., 1881, art. II.

Footnote 742:

  Const., 1859, art. V.

Footnote 743:

  Const., 1891, sec. 145.

Footnote 744:

  Const., 1819, art. II, as amended 1893.

Footnote 745:

  Const., 1867, art. I, secs. 1–3.

Footnote 746:

  Const., 1780, as amended 1821 and 1857.

Footnote 747:

  Const., 1850, art. VII, secs. 1 and 8.

Footnote 748:

  Const., 1858, art. VII.

Footnote 749:

  Const., 1875, art. VIII, secs. 2, 8, 10, and 11.

Footnote 750:

  Const., 1889, art. IX.

Footnote 751:

  Const., 1866, art. VII.

Footnote 752:

  Const., 1864, art. II.

Footnote 753:

  Public Stat., 1901, pp. 136–37.

Footnote 754:

  Const., 1864, art. II.

Footnote 755:

  Const., 1894, art. II.

Footnote 756:

  Const., 1889, as amended, sec. 121.

Footnote 757:

  Const., 1851, art. V.

Footnote 758:

  Const., 1907, art. III.

Footnote 759:

  Const., 1859, art. II.

Footnote 760:

  Const., 1874, art. VIII.

Footnote 761:

  Const., 1842, as amended 1888, art. II.

Footnote 762:

  Const., 1889, art. VII.

Footnote 763:

  Const., 1870, art. IV.

Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.

Race Distinctions in American Law

Race Distinctions in American Law

No reviews yet