Race Distinctions in American LawStephenson, Gilbert Thomas
History
Race Distinctions in American Law
Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas
African Americans -- Politics and government; Law -- United States -- History; United States -- Race relations
CHAPTER IV
THE “BLACK LAWS” OF 1865–68
One set of race distinctions deserves to be treated by itself. They have
long since become obsolete and were, during their existence, in a sense,
anomalous; yet they are, perhaps, the most illuminating from a
historical point of view of all the race distinctions in the law. They
were the result of the statutes that were enacted by the legislatures of
the Southern States between 1865 and 1868 for the definition and
establishment of the status of the Negro. The War closed in 1865; the
Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution was ratified July 28,
1868; and the Reconstruction régime in the South was not under way till
1868 or later. Therefore, during the interval between the close of the
War and the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment or the beginning of
active Reconstruction, the Southern States were free to adopt such
measures as they saw fit to establish the relation between the races.
The legislatures faced a new problem, or rather an old problem increased
many fold in perplexity. They had to establish the industrial, legal,
and political status of 4,000,000 people who had recently been slaves
and were now freemen. It must be remembered that when the Southern
legislatures convened in 1865 their actions with regard to the Negro
were not beset by the limitations subsequently fixed by the Federal
Government. The first Civil Rights Bill, that of 1866, had not been
passed. The Southern States were at liberty to enact such statutes as
they thought proper and to draw upon their own experience and that of
the free States with regard to free Negroes.
“BLACK LAWS” OF FREE STATES
These statutes of 1865–68 are here called the “Black Laws.” This term
was first applied to the laws of the border and Northern States passed
before and up to the Civil War to fix the position of free persons of
color. It is well to make a cursory examination of these laws of the
free States, because they are prototypes of many of the statutes enacted
by the Southern States while unhampered by Federal legislation. All the
States, North as well as South, had previously faced the problem of the
free Negro and made laws concerning him. Naturally, therefore, the
South, now that all its Negroes were declared free, turned for
precedents to the other States which had already had experience with the
free Negro.
The following are some of the statutes that had been enacted with regard
to free Negroes by States lying outside of what was later the
Confederacy:
Maryland,[56] in 1846, denied Negroes, slave or free, the right to
testify in cases in which any white person was concerned, though it
permitted the testimony of slaves against free Negroes. The
Constitution[57] of 1851 forbade the legislature to pass any law
abolishing the relation of master and servant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account