Race Distinctions in American LawStephenson, Gilbert Thomas
History
Race Distinctions in American Law
Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas
African Americans -- Politics and government; Law -- United States -- History; United States -- Race relations
Laws of S. C., 1865, p. 275.
Footnote 87:
Laws of Ala., 1865–66, p. 55.
Footnote 88:
Laws of Ky., 1865–66, pp. 68–69.
Footnote 89:
Laws of Miss., 1865, pp. 165–66.
Footnote 90:
Laws of Ariz., 1867, p. 19; 1873, p. 78.
Footnote 91:
_Ibid._, 1883, p. 114.
Footnote 92:
Laws of Idaho, 1879, p. 31.
Footnote 93:
Laws of Dak. Ty., 1864–65, p. 192.
Footnote 94:
Laws of Neb., 1881, p. 274; 1891, p. 267.
Footnote 95:
Gen. Laws of N. M., 1880, p. 427; act 1876, chap. 28.
Footnote 96:
Laws of Utah, 1882, p. 32.
Footnote 97:
Laws of Ore., 1868, pp. 18–19.
Footnote 98:
Laws of Wash., 1867, pp. 95–96.
Footnote 99:
Revised Stat., 1903, p. 202.
Footnote 100:
Laws of Fla., 1865, pp. 32–33.
Footnote 101:
_Ibid._, 1866, p. 22.
Footnote 102:
Laws of Ky., 1865–66, p. 52.
Footnote 103:
Laws of Miss., 1865, pp. 83–84.
Footnote 104:
Laws of Va., 1865–66, p. 83; repealed in 1871—Laws of Va., 1870–71, p.
147.
Footnote 105:
Laws of S. C., 1865, pp. 295–299 and 275–76.
Footnote 106:
Laws of Ala., 1865–66, pp. 128–31.
Footnote 107:
Laws of Ky., 1865–66, pp. 49–50.
Footnote 108:
Laws of Miss., 1865, pp. 86–90. This was repealed Feb. 1, 1867—Laws of
Miss., 1866–67, pp. 443–44.
Footnote 109:
Laws of N. C., 1874–75, p. 92.
Footnote 110:
Laws of S. C., 1865, pp. 292–95.
Footnote 111:
Revised Code, 1852, as amended in 1893, p. 609.
Footnote 112:
_In re_ Turner, 1867, Fed. Case No. 14,247.
Footnote 113:
Laws of S. C., 1865, pp. 303–04.
Footnote 114:
Laws of Miss., 1865, pp. 90–93.
Footnote 115:
Laws of S. C., 1865, pp. 299–303.
Footnote 116:
Laws of Miss., 1865, pp. 92–93.
CHAPTER V
RECONSTRUCTION OF MARITAL RELATIONS OF NEGROES
One of the perplexing problems that arose out of Emancipation was the
fixing of the marital relations among Negroes. It is generally known
that the marriage ties between slaves were loose and their domestic
relations irregular. In some instances, slave marriages were solemnized
according to legal requirements, by either a white clergyman or other
proper officer of the law; in others, there was the common law
marriage—that is, the parties lived together as husband and wife under a
simple, unrecorded agreement between themselves; in still other
instances, there was deplorable promiscuity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account