Race Distinctions in American LawStephenson, Gilbert Thomas
History
Race Distinctions in American Law
Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas
African Americans -- Politics and government; Law -- United States -- History; United States -- Race relations
The law of Virginia[142] provided that persons of color living as
husband and wife on February 27, 1866, whether or not any ceremony had
been performed, should be considered as lawfully married and their
children legitimate. If they had separated prior to that date the
children of the woman, if recognized by the man to be his, were
nevertheless legitimate. West Virginia[143] had practically the same
law, except the latter clause about recognition by the father.
Illinois,[144] as late as 1891, passed a statute to legalize slave
marriages and legitimate the children thereof. But this law did not
apply to a voidable slave marriage in another State, disaffirmed by a
subsequent legal marriage before the enactment of the statute.[145] A
similar decision under a similar statute was rendered in Ohio[146] in
1883. These decisions would indicate that a slave marriage was valid
only if there was no subsequent marriage of either party to a third
person. In 1876, New York[147] recognized as valid slave marriages
contracted in slave States with the consent of the master.
MARRIAGES BETWEEN SLAVES AND FREE NEGROES
Statutes relative to marriages between free Negroes and slaves are not
numerous. Presumably, the term “persons of color” included both Negroes
born free and those who had been slaves. A Tennessee court,[148] in
1882, held that the formal marriage of a free Negro and a slave, with
the consent of the master, followed by a cohabitation for years, was a
valid marriage and entitled the woman to dower.
FEDERAL LEGISLATION
The Congress of the United States has had occasion to pass upon the
validity of slave marriages only in connection with pensions to the
descendants of colored soldiers. An act[149] of 1873 provided that, in
determining whether the widow of a Negro or Indian soldier and sailor is
entitled to a pension, it is necessary only for the claimants to show
that she was married according to some ceremony, which she and the
deceased deemed obligatory, that they habitually recognized each other
as husband and wife, and were so recognized by their neighbors, and that
they lived together up to the date of his enlistment. It was also
provided that the children of such marriages might claim their father’s
pension.
Though they proceeded in different ways, practically all of the States
arrived at the same result. If slaves were married according to the
custom, if they lived as husband and wife both before and after
Emancipation, their union was considered a valid marriage to all intents
and purposes and the children thereof might inherit. Where the
procurement of a certificate or remarriage was required, if one of the
parties took advantage of the opportunity to be freed from the early
alliance, as happened in several amusing instances, and took another
spouse, the second marriage was the valid one, and the children of the
slave union could not inherit their parents’ property.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account