Race Distinctions in American LawStephenson, Gilbert Thomas
History
Race Distinctions in American Law
Stephenson, Gilbert Thomas
African Americans -- Politics and government; Law -- United States -- History; United States -- Race relations
In 1889 a Negro woman in Illinois, having been refused tickets to a
theatre, had a white man buy them for herself and her husband. On
presenting the tickets they were refused admission to seats in the
theatre which the tickets called for. At the resulting trial, the
proprietor offered to prove that he had, “in order to avoid collision
between the races, adopted a rule (and that such rule was necessary) to
the effect that the colored people should have one row to themselves in
each part of the house, or as many rows as the tickets which they bought
would call for.” This evidence was rejected, the court[286] holding that
the Civil Rights Bill of Illinois could not be satisfied by separate
accommodations.
Missouri has no Civil Rights Bill. A Negro, mistaken for a white man by
the clerk in the box-office, bought tickets for seats in the orchestra
of a Kansas City theatre. When he presented his tickets to the usher he
was refused the seats called for, but was offered in exchange balcony
seats reserved for Negroes. The court[287] before which the case was
tried held that the rule of the theatre requiring separate
accommodations for the races was not a violation of the Fourteenth
Amendment.
The most recent case[288] appears to be a 1905 case in New York in which
a Negro was ejected from a theatre by an employee. The proprietor was
permitted to show that the ejectment was done while he was away and
contrary to his orders, and that he permitted Negroes to enjoy the
privileges of the place. A verdict was thereupon found for him, but the
case was remanded by the appellate court for a new trial, on the ground
that the evidence was improperly admitted.
SKATING RINKS
California, Illinois, and Massachusetts have considered skating rinks of
enough importance to include them in their Civil Rights Bills. In 1885
the keeper of a skating rink in Iowa refused to let a Negro use it, and
the Negro brought suit. The court[289] held that the exclusion of a
colored man from a skating rink not licensed is not illegal. The New
York court[290] has held that a skating rink is a “place of public
amusement” within the meaning of the statute, so that a keeper of one
cannot refuse admission to a Negro.
CEMETERIES
The early Civil Rights Bills of New York, Florida, and Kansas prohibited
race distinctions in public cemeteries. This stipulation, however, does
not appear in the present statutes of any of the States, except Kansas.
Race distinctions in cemeteries are common. The legislature of
Mississippi[291] of 1900, for instance, gave the Ladies’ Auxiliary
Cemetery Association, an organization of white women, permission to
remove the monument and remains of the Negro State Secretary of State,
James Lynch, from the white to the Negro cemetery in Jackson,
Mississippi, provided it was done without expense to the State.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account