I made several experiments with radium enclosed in a little glass
vessel. The rays emerging from the vessel, after traversing a certain
space of air, were received in a condenser, which served to measure
their ionising capacity by the usual electrical method. The distance,
_d_, from the source to the condenser was varied, and the current of
saturation, _i_, obtained in the condenser was measured. The following
are the results of one of the series of determinations:—
_d_, c.m. _i._ _i_ × _d_^2 × 10^{–3}.
10 127 13
20 38 15
30 17·4 16
40 10·5 17
50 6·9 17
60 4·7 17
70 3·8 19
100 1·65 17
After a certain distance, the intensity of radiation varies inversely as
the square of the distance from the condenser.
The radiation of polonium is only propagated in air to a distance of a
few centimetres (4 to 6 c.m.) from the source of radiation.
In the case of the absorption of radiations by solid screens, we find
another fundamental difference between radium and polonium. Radium emits
rays capable of penetrating great thicknesses of solid matter, _e.g._,
several centimetres of lead or of glass. The rays which have passed
through a great thickness of a solid body are extremely penetrating, and
it is practically impossible to absorb them entirely by any material
whatever. But these rays form only a small fraction of the total
radiation, the greater part of which is absorbed by a slight thickness
of solid matter.
Polonium emits rays which are readily absorbed, and which can only pass
through extremely thin screens.
The following are figures showing the absorption produced by an
aluminium lamina of thickness 0·01 m.m. This lamina was placed above and
almost in contact with the substance. The direct radiation and that
transmitted by the aluminium were measured by the electrical method
(apparatus of Fig. 1); the current of saturation was practically
obtained in every case. I have represented the activity of the radiating
body by _a_, that of uranium being unity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account