For these measurements a metallic plate was used covered with a layer of
powdered uranium; this plate was not otherwise kept in the dark; this
precaution, according to the experimenters already quoted, being of no
importance. The number of measurements taken with this plate is very
great, and they actually extend over a period of five years.
Some researches were conducted to discover whether other substances were
capable of acting similarly to the uranium compounds. M. Schmidt was the
first to publish that thorium and its compounds possess exactly the same
property. A similar research, made contemporaneously, gave me the same
result. I published this not knowing at the time of Schmidt’s
publication.
We shall say that uranium, thorium, and their compounds emit _Becquerel
rays_. I have called _radio-active_ those substances which generate
emissions of this nature. This name has since been adopted generally.
In their photographic and electric effects, the Becquerel rays
approximate to the Röntgen rays. They also, like the latter, possess the
faculty of penetrating all matter. But their capacity for penetration is
very different; the rays of uranium and of thorium are arrested by some
millimetres of solid matter, and cannot traverse in air a distance
greater than a few centimetres; this at least is the case for the
greater part of the radiation.
The researches of different physicists, and primarily of Mr. Rutherford,
have shown that the Becquerel rays undergo neither regular reflection,
nor refraction, nor polarisation.
The feeble penetrating power of uranium and thorium rays would point to
their similarity to the secondary rays produced by the Röntgen rays, and
which have been investigated by M. Sagnac, rather than to the Röntgen
rays themselves.
For the rest, the Becquerel rays might be classified as cathode rays
propagated in the air. It is now known that these different analogies
are all legitimate.
_Measurement of the Intensity of Radiation._
[Illustration: FIG. 1.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account