The different actions of the radium rays on these fluorescent substances
can be illustrated very simply and beautifully by the following
experiment. A small U tube is filled with fragments of the fluorescent
substance arranged in layers. The U tube is immersed in liquid air and
the emanation from about 30 mgrs. of radium bromide is condensed in the
tube. On closing the tube and removing it from the liquid air, the
emanation distributes itself uniformly in the tube. The shades of colour
produced in the different substances are clearly seen.
It is observed that all the crystals increase in luminosity for several
hours, on account of the excited activity produced by the emanation.
This effect is especially observed in kunzite, which at first hardly
responds to the rays, since the β and γ rays, which causes it to
fluoresce, are not given out by the emanation itself but by one of its
later products. The intensity of the β and γ rays is, in consequence,
small at first but rises to a maximum after several hours; the
luminosity observed varies in a corresponding manner.
Sir William Crookes[188] has made an examination of the effect of
continued exposure of a diamond to the radium rays. An “off-colour”
diamond, of a pale yellow colour, was placed inside a tube with radium
bromide. After 78 days’ exposure, the diamond had darkened and become
bluish green in tint; when heated at 50° in a mixture of potassium
chlorate for ten days, the diamond lost its dull surface colour and was
bright and transparent, and its tint had changed to a pale bluish green.
The rays have thus a double action on the diamond; the less penetrating
β rays produce a superficial darkening due to the change of the surface
into graphite, while the more penetrating β rays and the γ rays produce
a change of colour throughout its mass. The diamond phosphoresced
brightly during the whole course of its exposure to the rays. Crookes
also observed that the diamond still retained enough activity to affect
a photographic plate 35 days after removal, although, during the period
of 10 days, it was heated in a mixture sufficiently powerful to remove
the outer skin of graphite. This residual activity may possibly be due
to a slow transformation product of the emanation which is deposited on
the surface of bodies (see chapter XI).
Marckwald observed that the α rays from radio-tellurium produced marked
phosphorescence on some kinds of diamonds. An account of the various
luminous effects produced on different gems by exposure to the radium
and actinium rays has been given by Kunz and Baskerville[189].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account