=131. Experimental evidence.= It now remains to consider further
experimental evidence in support of these hypotheses. The primary
conception is that the radio-active bodies are able to produce from
themselves matter of chemical properties different from those of the
parent substance, and that this process goes on at a constant rate. This
new matter initially possesses the property of activity, and loses it
according to a definite law. The fact that a proportion of the activity
of radium and thorium can be concentrated in small amounts of active
matter like Th X or Ur X does not, of itself, prove directly that a
material constituent responsible for the activity has been chemically
separated. For example, in the case of the separation of Th X from
thorium, it might be supposed that the non-thorium part of the solution
is rendered temporarily active by its association with thorium, and that
this property is retained through the processes of precipitation,
evaporation, and ignition, and finally manifests itself in the residue
remaining. According to this view it is to be expected that any
precipitate capable of removing the thorium completely from its solution
should yield active residues similar to those obtained from ammonia. No
such case has, however, been observed. For example, when thorium nitrate
is precipitated by sodium or ammonium carbonate, the residue from the
filtrate after evaporation and ignition is free from activity and the
thorium carbonate obtained has the normal amount of activity. In fact,
ammonia is the only reagent yet found capable of completely separating
Th X from thorium. A partial separation of the Th X can be made by
shaking thorium oxide with water owing to the greater solubility of Th X
in water.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account