In order to convey a sufficient quantity of emanation into the
half-cylinder _A_, it was necessary to heat the radium slightly. The
slide _S_ was closed and the side tubes opened. A slow current of dry
air from a gasometer was passed through a platinum tube, in which a
small quantity of radium compound was placed. The emanation was carried
with the air into the cylinder _A_. When a sufficient quantity had been
introduced, the stream of air was stopped. The side tubes were closed by
fine capillary tubes. These prevented any appreciable loss of gas due to
the diffusion, but served to keep the pressure of the gas inside _A_ at
the pressure of the outside air. The three entrance tubes into the
cylinder, shown in the figure, were for the purpose of initially mixing
the emanation and gas as uniformly as possible.
After standing several hours to make temperature conditions steady, the
slide was opened, and the emanation began to diffuse into the tube _B_.
The current through the tubes _A_ and _B_ was measured at regular
intervals by an electrometer, with a suitable capacity in parallel.
Initially there is no current in _B_, but after the opening of the
slide, the amount in _A_ decreased and the amount in _B_ steadily
increased. After several hours the amount in each half is nearly the
same, showing that the emanation is nearly uniformly diffused throughout
the cylinder.
It can readily be shown[255] that if
_K_ = coefficient of diffusion of the emanation into air,
_t_ = duration of diffusion experiments in secs.,
_a_ = total length of cylinder,
_S₁_ = partial pressure of emanation in tube _A_ at end of
diffusion,
_S₂_ = partial pressure of emanation in tube _B_ at end of
diffusion,
then
$$ \frac {S_1 − S_2} {S_1 + S_2} = \frac {8} {\pi^2} (e^{\frac {\pi^2
Kt} {a^2}} + \frac {1}{9}e^{-\frac {9 \pi^2 Kt} {a^2}} + ...) $$ .
Now the values of _S₁_ and _S₂_ are proportional to the saturation
ionization currents due to the emanations in the two halves of the
cylinder. From this equation _K_ can be determined, if the relative
values of _S₁_ and _S₂_ are observed after diffusion has been in
progress for a definite interval _t_.
The determination of _S₁_ and _S₂_ is complicated by the excited
activity produced on the walls of the vessel. The ionization due to this
must be subtracted from the total ionization observed in each half of
the cylinder, for the excited activity is produced from the material
composing the emanation, and is removed to the electrodes in an electric
field. The ratio of the current due to excited activity to the current
due to the emanation depends on the time of exposure to the emanation,
and is only proportional to it for exposures of several hours.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account