Mme Curie also found that bismuth was made active by solution with a
radium compound, and succeeded in fractionating the above bismuth in the
same way as polonium. In this way bismuth was obtained 2000 times as
active as uranium, but the activity, like that of polonium separated
from pitchblende, decreased with the time. In the light of the
experiments on the transformation products of radium, it is seen that
these early experiments of Mme Curie add additional confirmation to the
view that the product (radium F) separated from radium itself is
identical with the polonium obtained directly from pitchblende.
Footnote 314:
Rutherford and Soddy, _Phil. Mag._ April, 1903.
Footnote 315:
Rutherford, _Phil. Trans._ A. p. 169, 1904. Curie and Danne, _C. R._
p. 748, 1904.
Footnote 316:
P. Curie and Danne, _Comptes Rendus_, 138, p. 748, 1904.
Footnote 317:
Miss Gates, _Phys. Rev._ p. 300, 1903.
Footnote 318:
Miss Brooks, _Nature_, July 21, 1904.
Footnote 319:
Rutherford, _Phil. Mag._ Nov. 1904. _Nature_, p. 341, Feb. 9, 1905.
Footnote 320:
Rutherford, _Nature_, p. 341, Feb. 9, 1905.
Footnote 321:
Marckwald (_Ber. d. D. Chem. Ges._ p. 591, 1905) has recently found
that the activity of his radio-tellurium falls to half value in 139
days.
Footnote 322:
Meyer and Schweidler, _Wien Ber._ Dec. 1, 1904.
Footnote 323:
Rutherford, _Phil. Trans._ A. p. 169, 1904.
Footnote 324:
Hofmann, Gonder and Wölfl, _Annal. d. Phys._ 15, p. 615, 1904.
CHAPTER XII.
RATE OF EMISSION OF ENERGY.
=243.= It was early recognised that a considerable amount of energy is
emitted by the radio-active bodies in the form of their characteristic
radiations. Most of the early estimates of the amount of this energy
were based on the number and energy of the expelled particles, and were
much too small. It has been pointed out (section 114) that the greater
part of the energy emitted from the radio-active bodies in the form of
ionizing radiations is due to the α rays, and that the β rays in
comparison supply only a very small fraction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account