Railroads: Rates and RegulationsRipley, William Zebina
History
Railroads: Rates and Regulations
Ripley, William Zebina
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
This roundabout carriage becomes of course increasingly wasteful in
proportion to the width of angle between the main lines converging on
the common point. And several cases indicate that in extreme instances
the two main lines may converge on a common point from exactly opposite
directions, while the transverse or secondary road or series of roads
forms a wide and roundabout detour. The well known Pittsburg-Youngstown
case, cited in the original Louisville & Nashville decision in 1887,
serves as illustration. The Pennsylvania was competing from Pittsburg
directly eastbound to New York with certain feeders of the New York
Central lines which took out traffic bound for the same destination
but leaving Pittsburg westbound.[290] Other instances of the same
phenomenon occur at Chattanooga, where freight for New York may leave
either northward or southward, at Kansas City and in fact at almost any
important inland centre.
Another extreme form may arise even in the competition between two
parallel trunk lines cut transversely by two independent cross roads.
One of these latter may induce traffic to desert the direct route, to
cut across to the other trunk line, to move over that some distance
and then to be hauled back again to a point on the first main line
where it may find a "cut" rate to destination. Grain sometimes used
literally to meander to the seaboard in the days of active competition
between the trunk lines. Wheat from Iowa and northern Illinois finally
reached Portland, Maine, by way of Cincinnati in this manner, with a
superfluous carriage of from 250 to 350 miles:
"Starting within 90 miles of Chicago, though billed due
northeast to Portland, wheat has travelled first 97 miles due
southwest to avail of the connection of the Baltimore and Ohio
Railroad for Cincinnati, and thence north to Detroit Junction,
a total of 716 miles to reach the latter point and save 5 cents
in freight. The direct haul through Chicago would have been 340
miles less, or a total of 376 miles only."[291]
Another witness describes the route as follows:
Property billed for Portland, Me., started 90 miles below
Chicago, although Chicago is on a direct line, and took a
southeasterly course, then to Springfield, from Springfield
to Flora, then to Cincinnati, and then over the Hamilton and
Dayton system to Detroit, there to take the Grand Trunk road
to Portland. This was owing to the billing system adhered to
here with great tenacity. Property ran around three sides of a
square, and I lost money on some of that property.[292]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account