Ramsey & Carmick, contract.: Letter from the Postmaster General transmitting copy of a conditional mail contract; also copies of correspondence relative to the sameVarious
History
Ramsey & Carmick, contract.: Letter from the Postmaster General transmitting copy of a conditional mail contract; also copies of correspondence relative to the same
Various
Postal service -- United States -- History -- Sources
33d CONGRESS, _2d Session_. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. EX. DOC. NO. 47.
RAMSEY & CARMICK—CONTRACT.
LETTER
FROM
THE POSTMASTER GENERAL,
TRANSMITTING
_Copy of a conditional mail contract; also copies of
correspondence relative to the same_.
FEBRUARY 1, 1855.—Referred to the Committee on the Post Office
and Post Roads, and ordered to be printed.
POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT,
_Washington, January 31, 1855_.
SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, in compliance with the
resolution of the House of the 2d of January instant, a copy of the
conditional contract made by my predecessor, Mr. Hubbard, with Messrs.
Ramsey & Carmick, on the 3d of March, 1853, for the extension of two of
the trips on the New Orleans and Vera Cruz line, from Vera Cruz, Mexico,
via Acapulco, to San Francisco in California; also copies of all the
correspondence relative to the same, and also relative to the change of
schedule proposed on the line from New Orleans to Vera Cruz.
My views in regard to this contract were fully stated in my annual
report to Congress of December 1, 1853, and are also contained in the
correspondence herewith communicated. It was not deemed necessary to
answer the letter of Robert G. Rankin, president of the Mexican Ocean
Mail and Inland Company, dated November 23, 1853, and received at the
department on the 30th of January, 1854. That they were not prepared to
fulfil their conditional contract on the 23d of November, 1853, nine
months after its execution, is therein conceded, and the department had
neither the time nor desire to enter into a discussion of the irrelevant
matters introduced into the body of that letter.
The objections which I entertained to the change of schedule on the New
Orleans and Vera Cruz route, proposed, by Messrs. Harris & Morgan in
their letter of the 26th October, 1853, were two-fold:
1st. That by authorizing the change proposed the original intent and
object of my predecessor, Mr. Hubbard, in entering into the conditional
contract with Messrs. Ramsey and Carmick—which was, to secure an
additional semi-monthly mail between the Atlantic States and California
by alternating at regular intervals with the present semi-monthly line
via Panama—would have been entirely frustrated; and thus, instead of
having a weekly mail between the Atlantic and Pacific, there would have
been, as heretofore, only a semi-monthly communication.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account