Ramsey & Carmick, contract.: Letter from the Postmaster General transmitting copy of a conditional mail contract; also copies of correspondence relative to the sameVarious
History
Ramsey & Carmick, contract.: Letter from the Postmaster General transmitting copy of a conditional mail contract; also copies of correspondence relative to the same
Various
Postal service -- United States -- History -- Sources
SIR: In accordance with a request from Messrs. Ramsey and Carmick, the
contractors named in the contract hereinafter mentioned, I have the honor
of reporting to your department _the real character of the relations this
company sustains to the contract; the obstacles to the non-fulfilment of
it by a date as early as was anticipated; and a few remarks explanatory
of the route_.
On the 15th day of February, 1853, a contract was made by the United
States government, acting by the Postmaster General, with Albert C.
Ramsey and Edward H. Carmick, of Pennsylvania, to carry the United States
mails between San Francisco and Vera Cruz, at certain definite and
specific periods mentioned in the schedule of the contract, for the sum
of $424,000 per year, for the period of four years, with the privilege
of extending it one year if the Post Office Department thought proper.
This contract was not of that liberal form heretofore characteristic of
all the other ocean mail contracts, but was in a form of that specific
and detailed character peculiar to any short land service, where time
might be insured to a minute. The contract was, in fact, so stringent
as to be incompatible with any but an honest intention to fulfil its
spirit and letter, in which spirit it was, in fact, assumed by the
parties associated in its performance. This contract was printed and
sent to the Senate at its last session, and is now on its files. By the
5th section of the law of 1848 it is illegal for contractors to assign
their contracts; and although aware that the department is not bound to
recognise any but the contractors, yet, frankness enforces the propriety
of saying that, by specific covenants, this company have agreed with
Messrs. Ramsey and Carmick to fulfil all the conditions of the contract
on their part, to be kept and performed in relation to the land service
between Vera Cruz and Acapulco, and that similar covenants have been
made with the Pacific Mail Steamship Company (William H. Aspinwall,
esq., president) for the sea service between Acapulco and San Francisco.
The contract distinctly specified that its schedule time (and in fact
the spirit of the contract) was to the intent that it should form part
and parcel of the contract for the gulf service, being an extension
of two of the trips between New Orleans and Vera Cruz, made (under a
specific law, August 30, 1852) with Mr. Carmick, so as to form, in its
own language, “_one through-line in sixteen days between New Orleans
and San Francisco_.” The gulf contract is without any condition as to
an appropriation; but the larger or Pacific contract is made contingent
upon an appropriation by Congress for its approval. The question might
be gravely raised, in looking at one contract as an integral part of
the other, whether the appropriation by Congress of $70,000 (a trifle
more than it was bid for and taken by Mr. Carmick, viz: $69,750) for the
gulf service, was not an approval in terms of the Pacific contract, and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account