Rasputin and the Russian RevolutionRadziwill, Catherine, Princess
History
Rasputin and the Russian Revolution
Radziwill, Catherine, Princess
Rasputin, Grigorii Efimovich, 1869-1916; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921
Rasputin was far too clever ever to say one word capable of offending
the Empress, whose proud temperament would never have forgiven him any
familiarity had he dared to venture upon it. Whenever he was in her
presence he kept a most humble attitude, and certainly never discussed
with her any matters of state and never dared entertain her with aught
else than religious questions. He was far less guarded with regard to
what he told the Emperor, with whom it is unfortunately true that he
sometimes allowed himself remarks he would have done better to keep
to himself. But the Czar never looked upon him in any other light
than in that of a jester whose sayings were absolutely devoid of any
importance whatever, but who could amuse him at times by the daring
manner in which he would touch upon things and criticise people whose
names no one else would ever have dared to mention in a disparaging
tone before Nicholas II. But between that and the possession of any
real power and influence, there was an abyss which, unfortunately, in
view of the turn that events were to take, no one noticed among all
those who lamented over the almost constant presence of Rasputin at
Tsarskoie Selo.
All that I have said, however, refers only to the Emperor and Empress.
In regard to some people who surrounded them it was not quite the
same. It is certain that from the first day that the “Prophet” was
introduced at Tsarskoie Selo some intriguing persons applied themselves
to make use of him for their own special benefit and advantage, and
tried to create around him a legend that had hardly anything in common
with the real truth. It is useless to mention the names of these
people, whose influence it must be hoped is now at an end. But it is
impossible not to speak of their activity in regard to the spreading of
these rumours which attributed to Rasputin an importance he was never
really in possession of. This caused no small damage to the prestige
of the dynasty. Rasputin ought to have been considered for what he
was--that is, a kind of jester, “un fou du roi,” who, like Chicot in
Dumas’ famous novels, allowed himself to say all that he thought to
his sovereign and whose words or actions no one could take seriously
into account. Instead of this some ambitious men and women, mostly
belonging to that special class of Tchinovnikis or civil functionaries
that has always been the curse of Russia and that, happily, is losing
every day something of its former power, profited by the circumstance
that the solitary existence led by the Imperial Court in its various
residences did not allow any outside rumours to penetrate to the ears
of the rulers of the country. They intentionally transformed Rasputin
into a kind of _deus ex machina_, whose hand could be traced in every
event of importance which occurred and who could at will remove and
appoint Ministers, generals, ladies in waiting, court officials and
at last induce the Czar himself to deprive his uncle, the Grand Duke
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account