Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands : $b Evidence, speeches, and papers in its favour
General
Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands : $b Evidence, speeches, and papers in its favour
Patents
Consumers pay exorbitant prices during a number of years for the
manufacture so patented, or receive the same in a less perfect condition
than would be the case if competition had exercised its wholesome
influence on the manufacture of the article in question. It may be
rejoined, that nobody is forced to buy the patented article, or to make
use of the patented invention; also that the common weal would profit
more by the utilisation of an invention, even if burthened for a period
of from five to fifteen years, than not have it in use at all.
To this it could be replied, with good reason, that with the constant
activity which working minds develop upon all fields of industry, the
invention of it would have been made shortly after by B, and by him
possibly would have been brought to light in still greater perfection. If
the invention of A, however, is patented, the inventive perfectioning of
the object by B must rest until the expiration of A’s Patent.
The more an invention is to the purpose for general adaptability, the
more reasonable appears the supposition that others would have arrived at
the same invention.
In spite of the contrary intention, Patents proved themselves an
impediment to the progress of human ingenuity, and by each newly-granted
Patent an unrelenting “halt” is shouted to the competition in that
direction.
On closer reflection, even persons who move in circles which, from
personal interest, have hitherto used their influence to give the
greatest possible stability to Patent-rights, will come to the conviction
that the disadvantages outweigh by far the advantages.
The Patent system, viewed from a standpoint of political economy,
produces a similar influence as the Lottery. The “grand prize” dazzles
all; however, only one can have it, and the multitude of those who
contributed to the solving of the problem lose very often a not
inconsiderable stake in uselessly-incurred costs, and lost time and
trouble.
Many have been induced by the system to rush after doubtful reward in
the shape of a Patent, instead of steadily applying their ability and
knowledge to regular industry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account