Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands : $b Evidence, speeches, and papers in its favour
General
Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands : $b Evidence, speeches, and papers in its favour
Patents
Besides, it is not sufficient to make up one’s mind to make an invention
capable of being patented; such proceedings lead to a success in the
most rare cases. The most important discoveries have proceeded, on the
contrary, from those who thoughtfully prosecute their regular avocations.
The fear that with abolition of Patents the ingenuity of mankind would
slacken, we cannot share, because the germ of progress is embodied
in human nature, and because the joy over an invention made, and the
satisfaction felt at a new discovery, in themselves are powerful impulses
for the employment of energies in such directions. A strong proof of the
correctness of this assertion the men of science furnish, whom we have to
thank for the most important discoveries, in so far as the application
of physical and chemical laws to industry are concerned—which have been
always handed over immediately to the public with the utmost liberality.
Others have based their inventions on such laws, and managed to acquire
for this one or that other a Patent, and thus, to their own advantage
and to the cost of the public, made an invasion of territory hardly
legitimately theirs. They reaped where others had sowed.
Let us take, for instance, all the lighting apparatuses during the last
twenty-five years. The different lamp contrivances during this period
for which Patents have been granted by the industrial States of Europe
will number several hundreds. Now, if we sift the matter, we will find
that all these patented combinations are simply variations of a principle
which Berzelius established and applied to his spirit-lamp.
Similar is the experience with the invention of Bunsen, who reduced the
costs of the electric battery considerably, by applying a hard sort of
coke in place of the platinum in Grove’s Battery.
In a still higher degree has Morse acted meritoriously. It is true,
Morse, in consideration of the signal importance of his invention,
has received a public reward in the shape of money, and this mode of
acknowledging real merit in the province of inventions recommends itself
for adoption even in individual States.
After the abolition of Patents, apart from such acknowledgments as
aforesaid, very soon associations of the various interested parties who,
by each discovery, would be equally benefited, will be formed for the
purpose of rewarding new inventions made in accordance with indicated
problems, the solution of which may be felt to be most important to them.
For State rewards only such inventions should be taken cognizance of as,
according to their nature, cannot be kept secret, and are not of a kind
that will ensure to the inventor an adequate reward by his own use of
them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account