Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands : $b Evidence, speeches, and papers in its favour
General
Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands : $b Evidence, speeches, and papers in its favour
Patents
“Take the Electric Telegraph Company. I believe we should
have had that telegraph much improved, and that it would be
working much cheaper, and that we should have had it all over
the country, but for the misfortune they laboured under, of
having Patents which they were obliged to protect; and they
were obliged to buy up everybody’s inventions, good or bad,
that interfered technically with theirs. I firmly believe that
they have been obliged to refrain from adopting many good
improvements which they might have introduced themselves, but
did not, because they were afraid that it might shake their
Patent; and I believe that the stoppage put to inventions by
this state of things is far greater than would result from
secrecy.”
The same is certified by Sir W. Armstrong:—
“I am quite satisfied that a very great number of inventions
which have remained inoperative for years and years, many
of which I could easily name, would have been brought to
perfection very much sooner if it had been open to all the
intellects of the country to grapple with the difficulties of
them.
“May we take it that under the present system, if a man has
obtained a Patent with little or no inquiry, although that
Patent would not stand investigation if opposed, yet if the
patentee is content to impose a moderate tax upon those who
want to use his invention, they will pay that sum without its
being worth anybody’s while to contest it?—Yes.
“Do you believe that the cases of that kind are very
numerous?—Very numerous, and the cases are still more numerous
in which the existence of a monopoly simply has the effect of
deterring other persons from following up that particular line
of improvement.”
Another effect is the restraining of publication. Hear Mr. Richard
Roberts’ thrilling representations:—
“I have a list of something like 100 inventions that I should
have patented thirty or forty years ago, but for the cost.
“I could mention one by which many lives would have been saved
if I had had a Patent for it.
“I very rarely make models, but I had one made for this. It was
made many years ago. I invented it in 1830, and I mean to say
that, if it had been put into practice, things would not have
happened which have happened, and which have caused the loss of
many lives, as connected with railways.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account