Personally, I should have preferred to have deferred publishing the text, in order to have had an opportunity of careful and exact comparative study of the piece in its relation to the Tudor drama as a _whole_ as well as "_play_"-meal. On the other hand, I felt that the generous support we have met with at the hands of the Society's subscribers would be best repaid by speedy publication--"In the city of Jerusalem ... walled" (353,_c_), if the play has come to us intact, and the lack of continuity is intentional, the punctuation of this passage must be altered: delete the full point after _called_ and regard the next line as a parenthesis, and substitute a semicolon for the period after _walled_--"in the _lane of business_" (354,_a_), in original _laue_ of _besynesse_--"Yes, on the left side" (354,_c_), _Ies_ in original--"full of _slouthy_ bushes" (355,_b_), this may be _flouthy_--"_Fumus_ _tormentorum_" (355,_d_), in original _Finit_: Latin quotations, _supra_ (418,_d_)--"[_Iris_]. It is time for to be walking, &c." (356,_a_), these two lines are not in original given to Irisdision, but form part of Eugenios' speech, which proceeds without a break to "Sir William of Trentram" (357,_a_). They seem to me, however, to be rightly restored as now given--"by books _Amromes_" (356,_b_), so in original:? a misprint for _amorous_, which would at least restore the sense. There is, moreover, nothing in original to suggest a break--"_St. John the Evangelist_" (357,_a_), preceded by [+] instead of the usual "leaf"--"plain _information_" (357,_b_) in original _infymacyon_--"I am _that_ John that" (357,_b_), in original "I am John that": a blunder I carelessly passed--"saw _Lungis_" (357,_c_), original _Longes_: see (424,_d_)--"almost changed my mood" (359,_c_), original _mode_--"have _been_ so witty" (359,_c_), in original _brn_--"_Yes_, yes daily" (362,_b_), in original _Ies_--"some pleasure then there _appears_" (363,_d_), in original _areres_--"between your ears" (363,_d_), in original _bytwene_--"make thee to _fly_" (365,_b_), a mistake: the original is _stye_ (= ascend, A.S.)--"_Deo_ _gratias ago tibi_" (366,_b_), substitute a full point for the comma--"In _that_ he thanked God" (366,_b_), in original _than_--"By raveners ... men can rehearse" (366,_c_). I do not feel sure that the present punctuation gives the best rendering of the original, which is entirely unstopped--"In that cayme" (366,_c_), see _supra, s.v._ Cayme:? Cain--"_Against_ _God_" (366,_d_), in original _Agayne_--"Who doth hie him shall be _ho_" (367,_a_), see _supra,_ _s.v._ Ho.