Recently Recovered "Lost" Tudor Plays with some others
History
Recently Recovered "Lost" Tudor Plays with some others
English drama -- Early modern and Elizabethan, 1500-1600; Interludes, English; Moralities, English
Pollard's exhaustive account as given in the introduction to
the Early English Text Society's _Macro Plays_ (Extra Series,
xci.). Boiled down, the facts are these, so far as they relate
to the two Macro Plays included in the present volume, _Mankind_
and _Respublica_. _Mankind_ now forms part of a volume which in
the eighteenth century contained other plays and treatises in
manuscript, with which we need not now concern ourselves, except
to remark the strange juxtaposition of old moralities, a Juvenal,
a treatise on alchemy, etc. When sold at auction in 1820 the
collection was broken up, and three plays, _Mankind_, _Wisdom_,
and _The_ _Castle of Perseverance_, bound afresh in one volume.
Other points of interest are given by Mr. Pollard, but which I
pass by as not germane to the present purpose. The manuscript of
_Mankind_ and _Wisdom_ are contemporaneous; and were, says Mr.
Pollard, in the same ownership before the end of the fifteenth
century. This is in all likelihood a fact; but that the ownership
was a purely personal one is not so clear as appears at first
sight, or for the reasons stated by Mr. Pollard. It is now
necessary for me to quote Mr. Pollard's own words in order to
make my suggestions quite clear. He says: "It is ... possible
that both this play and ... [_Wisdom_] were written in different
parts of a miscellany-book belonging to Monk Hyngham, though
the fact that his doggerel inscription of ownership is written
after each of them inclines one at first to think that they were
separate units among his possessions. As it occurs at the end of
this play [_Mankind_], the inscription ... has been partly erased
and partly cut through, the lower part of the leaf being supplied
with modern paper. Enough, however, of the inscription remains
to make it fairly certain that it reads like that at the end of
the next play: O liber si quis cui constas forte queretur Hyngham
q_ue_ monacho dices super o_mn_ia, co_n_sto. This apparently is
to be translated (I owe the suggestion to Dr. Warner): 'O book,
if any one by chance asks to whom do you belong, you are to say
I belong to Hyngham, above everything which a monk can own.'
Who Monk Hyngham was we do not know. He may have belonged to
Bury-St.-Edmunds, whence some of the Macro manuscripts are said
to have come." Thus far also Mr. Pollard.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account