Recently Recovered "Lost" Tudor Plays with some others
History
Recently Recovered "Lost" Tudor Plays with some others
English drama -- Early modern and Elizabethan, 1500-1600; Interludes, English; Moralities, English
fylde fell_ in MS.: I have followed the Manly text, which is
based on a suggestion of Prof. Kittredge's, that _fylde_ was
written by mistake, and that the copyist then, observing that
_fylde_ neither rhymed nor made sense, added the right word, but
neglected to erase _fylde_--"Christ's curse _have ye_" (7,_b_),
_hade_ in MS. = had ye = have ye--"I had the _cup in_ my hand"
(7,_b_), MS. has _cup ready in_: so also F and B; M as in present
text--"Say _no[ugh]t_ again" (7,_c_), I have followed Manly: B
and F have _not_ as in MS.--"shall find us _sh[r]ews_" (7,_c_),
_schewys_ in MS.--"that brought you _hither_" (7,_c_), _brethern_
in MS., _hither_ being M's emendation with a suggestion that
possibly _brether_ is the right word: F and B follow MS.--"Ye
betray _many men_" (7,_d_), "_a man_" struck out (F)--"_my_
denomination" (8,_a_), "_by_" written over in MS. (F)--"a little
force" (8,_a_), _faus_ in MS.--"full of English Latin" (8,_a_),
a marginal note says: "to have this English made in Latin: I am
a-ferde yt wyll brest: 'It ram be' [? MS.], quod the bocher on-to
me, 'When I stale a leg a motun [gh]e are a stronge cunnynge
clerke, I prey,' etc."--"_here is a pardon by limit_" (8,_c_),
I have omitted _lo_ before "here" by mistake: "pardon by limit"
is in original, _pardon bely mett_--"the demonical frayry"
(8,_d_), M supposes a line lost here, but there is no indication
of such in the MS.--"of _their_ own Christ" (9,_b_), _her_ in
MS.--"Alas! what was thy fortune" (10,_d_), here a marginal note
in the MS. occurs, "I may both syth and sobbe; þis ys a pituose
remembrance, O In my soull, so sotyll in thy substance." Prof.
Manly says "this may be a part of the three lines necessary to
restore the versification." He indicates a line missing before
the line beginning "Alas! what was thy fortune," and two lines
missing after the line ending "that stinking dunghill"--"[MANKIND
_approaches_ MERCY" (11,_a_), F adds "and kneels to him"--"In
_sinful_ guiding" (11,_b_), _sympull_ in MS. which is followed
by F; M has _sinful_--"_Vita hominis est_ milicia" (11,_d_),
nnilicia in MS.--"Measure yourself," etc. (12,_b_), this line is
in margin in MS.--"_I trow_ and ye were" (12,_d_), _It row_ in
MS.: the same miscript occurs at 13,_a_--"_Mo than a_ good sort"
(13,_b_), M suggests emending to "Methink a"--"To _them_ ye will
go" (13,_b_), _hem_ in MS.; I follow M: B suggests _hom_--"by
Saint _Quintin_" (13,_c_), _Sent_ _Qisyntyn_ in MS.--"I am even
_very weary_" (13,_c_), _wery wery_ in MS.--"be there again
to-morrow" (13,_c_), M, for the sake of the rhyme, suggests
_to-morne_--"patience of Job _in_ tribulation" (14,_a_), so in
M: the MS. has &--"my own sweet son" (14,_a_), against this
line in the margin in another hand is, "_ita factum est_"--"To
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account