Recollections and impressions of James A. McNeill Whistler — John Shaqi
Recollections and impressions of James A. McNeill WhistlerEddy, Arthur Jerome
General
Recollections and impressions of James A. McNeill Whistler
Eddy, Arthur Jerome
Painters -- United States -- 19th century -- Biography; Whistler, James McNeill, 1834-1903
He was very particular concerning his hats. In the latter Paris days he
always wore a most carefully-brushed silk hat with flat brim,--the
Quartier-Latin type. This, with his monocle--for on the street he wore a
monocle--and his long overcoat, made him an exceedingly striking figure.
One day he was in a shop, trying on a hat, when a dissatisfied customer
rushed in, and, mistaking him for some one in charge, said:
“I say, this ’at doesn’t fit.”
Eyeing him critically a moment, Whistler said:
“Neither does your coat.”
* * * * *
Whistler was thoroughly imbued with the military spirit; and if he had
not been a great artist he would have made a good officer. He was born
to command, and possessed physical courage of a high order.
In stature and physique he was short and very slight,--could not have
weighed more than one hundred and thirty pounds; but he was so perfectly
proportioned that one did not notice his size except when in sharp
contrast with others. Notwithstanding his inferiority in size and
strength, he never in his life had the slightest hesitation in striking
a man--even at the risk of annihilation--if he deemed the occasion
required it.
A good many years ago the editor of a gossipy sheet in London, called
the _Hawk_, printed some items of a personal nature which Whistler
resented. Not knowing the editor by sight, Whistler took a friend to
point him out in the foyer of one of the London theatres. Although the
man was a giant compared with Whistler, the latter, without a moment’s
hesitation, went up to him and struck him across the face with a cane,
saying with each blow, “Hawk, Hawk, Hawk.”
The editor afterwards boasted that he immediately knocked Whistler down.
Whistler claimed he slipped and fell; but, he said:
“What difference does it make whether he knocked me down or whether
I slipped? The fact is he was publicly caned, and what happened
afterwards could not offset the publicity and nature of this
chastisement. A gentleman lightly strikes another in the face with
a glove; the bully thinks the insult is wiped out if he knocks some
one down--the ethics of the prize ring; but according to the older
notions the gentleman knows that the soft touch of the glove cannot
be effaced by a blow of the fist,--for if it could, superiority in
weight would render the cad and the bully immune. The historical
fact is that I publicly drew my cane across his face; no one cares
anything about his subsequent ragings, or whether I slipped and
fell, or whether he trampled upon me.”
Again, when an artist went up to him in the Hogarth Club in London and
called him a liar and a coward, Whistler promptly slapped his face.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account