Recollections and impressions of James A. McNeill WhistlerEddy, Arthur Jerome
General
Recollections and impressions of James A. McNeill Whistler
Eddy, Arthur Jerome
Painters -- United States -- 19th century -- Biography; Whistler, James McNeill, 1834-1903
The Puritan element which is to be found in every American achievement,
whether in war, in art, or in literature, though often deeply hidden, is
conspicuous in Whistler’s work, though he himself would probably have
been the first to deny it; and it is this element of sobriety, of
steadfastness, of undeviating adherence to convictions and ideals that
constitutes the firm foundation of his art, of his many brilliant and
beautiful superstructures of fancy.
Only a Puritan at heart could have painted the “Carlyle,” “His Mother,”
and that wonderful child portrait, “Miss Alexander.”
Only a Puritan at heart could have painted the mystery of night with all
his tender, loving, religious sympathy.
Only a Puritan at heart could have exhibited as he did in everything he
touched those infinitely precious qualities of reserve, of delicacy, of
refinement, which are the conspicuous characteristics of his work.
Concerning his refinement some one has very truly remarked:
“He so hated everything ugly or unclean that, even in the club
smoking-rooms (where one may sometimes hear rather Rabelaisian
tales), he never told a story which could not have been repeated in
the presence of modest women. His personal daintiness was extreme.
Threadbare coats on him were never shabby. He had to wear too many
threadbare garments, poor fellow! for, inasmuch as he put the
integrity of his art before everything else, he never stooped to
make those ‘pretty’ things which would have brought him a fortune,
without doubt. He was abstemious in his living, simple in all that
he did,--his exquisite, sure taste preventing him from extremes,
gaudiness, or untidiness.”
And when he lent his support, some eight years ago, to the school kept
by Carmen Rossi, who as a child had been one of his models, he would not
tolerate the study of the nude by mixed classes, and, in fact,
introduced many rules and restrictions which were considered by even
American pupils as “puritanical” in the extreme, and which the French
could not understand at all.
[Illustration]
He never painted any large and aggressive nudes, such as abound in
French art, such as, in a way, may be said to characterize French art
and mark its attitude towards life; but he made many drawings in
water-color and pastel, and painted some oils, all, however, exquisitely
refined, the element of the nude being in every instance subordinated to
the artistic scheme and intention. Many of these drawings have never
been exhibited. When seen they will go far towards demonstrating the
puritanical element in Whistler.
In his intolerance towards the methods, convictions, and ideals of
others he exhibited some of the spirit of the Puritan zealot who knows
no creed but his own.
Concerning his Americanism, one who knew him says:[2]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account