Louisiana -- Politics and government -- 1865-1950; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Louisiana; Thesis (Ph. D.)
Small extravagances helped to swell the total cost of this Assembly to
$264,278.06.[110] There were certain items in the general appropriation
bill which looked unnecessarily large. When a mere clerk of a district
court received a salary of $6,000, and the rental of a building for
a state house cost $13,000 for nine months; when the always elastic
clause for contingent expenses was stretched to $16,000; when printing
and advertising mounted up to $183,000, the people might well begin to
question and murmur. A bit of sarcasm was unconsciously incorporated in
the printing appropriation of 1870 when a motion to substitute $200,000
for the original $140,000, asking some of these liberal-hearted
gentlemen to open their hearts a little wider and take in every
official journal of the State, was adopted.[111] The interest alone on
bonds issued to railroads is probably accurate enough, but had reached
the terrifying sum of $461,014.14. The only spasm of economy which the
House suffered during the entire session of 1869 was really a pick at
the police, when a few minor officials were struck off or reduced in
salary.[112]
The law which was to provide the income seemed to bear no relation to
the expenditures. Unwisely wasting their time on a bill to enforce
collection of taxes already paid to the Confederacy,[113] they rushed
the revenue bill through with a haste which explains its inadequacy.
Urged by the Committee on Ways and Means to accept its work as
complete, even the reading was dispensed with, and the act, which was
referred to in a later session as a disgrace,[114] adopted by the House
without discussion on the evening of March 3.[115] A clause which
provoked the greatest criticism was one licensing gambling-houses,
which appeared in the published bill and came up for a perfect storm
of debate in the session of 1870. The chairman of the committee stated
that it had not been in the original law, and that he believed it had
been surreptitiously introduced after it had been acted upon by the
House.[116] Moreover, a bill which made no provision for the interest
on the debt, which made an appropriation for an institution which did
not exist,[117] and which failed to meet the liabilities of the State
by $500,000,[118] indicated business financiering which sooner or later
must bring the State to bankruptcy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account