Louisiana -- Politics and government -- 1865-1950; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Louisiana; Thesis (Ph. D.)
[72] House Deb., 1869, 139; 1870, 191, 231. Sen. Deb., 1870,
705.
[73] Sen. Deb., 1870, 639-40. House Deb., 1871, 87, where the
gentleman from Orleans declared that he would not come to order, and
did not heed the sergeant.
[74] House Deb., 1869, 294.
[75] _Ibid._, 1871, 90.
[76] Carr had come from Maryland in 1865, was now twenty-six
or twenty-seven years old, shrewd and wily in the extreme. House Misc.
Docs., 42 Cong., 2 Sess., No. 211, 217.
[77] _Crescent_, Jan. 26, 1869.
[78] House Deb., 1871, 135-6.
[79] _Ibid._, 1869, 111-12. The following statement of the
speaker establishes the fact for 1871 clearly: “I will not allow while
I am speaker of the House, to have spirituous liquors brought into the
House. I must maintain the dignity of this House, if the House will not
maintain its own dignity. I do not desire such a thing shall be done
again.” _Ibid._, 1871, 114.
[80] _Ibid._, 1869, 524.
[81] Senate Deb., 1870, 222-3.
[82] See speech on the constabulary bill, _Ibid._, 223-4.
[83] Sen. Deb., 1870, 222-3.
[84] House Misc. Doc., 42 Cong., 2 Sess., No. 211, 534. Note
also the opinion of Nordhoff, prejudiced for negro rights. He was
“unpleasantly startled,” not because they were black, but because they
were so transparently ignorant and unfit, 49.
[85] House Deb., 1870, 236.
[86] _Ibid._, 1870, 345.
[87] _Ibid._, 326.
[88] House Deb., 1869, 331.
[89] _Ibid._, 1871, 7-8.
[90] _Ibid._, 200.
[91] _Ibid._, 1869, 204.
[92] _Ibid._, 1870, 78. Mr. McMillan characterized this spirit
as follows: “That the House will pass it, I am convinced, for there is
always something peculiar in the air which tells me when a bill of this
character is sure of being put through, and I feel the breath of that
air distinctly at this moment,” 268.
[93] House Deb., 1869, 330.
[94] _Ibid._, 264.
[95] “Such influence we all know has been exerted for personal
aggrandizement and to such an extent that in point of fact the General
Assembly was actually turned into a machine for the advancement of the
individual interests of its leaders.” _Bee_, Jan. 24, 1869. See also
_Commercial Bulletin_, Feb. 6, 22.
[96] Charges of bribery were brought in connection with the
penitentiary bill, the slaughter house bill, and Chattanooga Railroad
bill. The boldest charge came out on the paving bill: “I know who are
lobbying this bill, and know the men they are using, and state upon the
floor of this committee that this is simply for the benefit of that
very man, and for the benefit of the lobbyists.” _Ibid._, 357-8.
[97] House Deb., 1869, 72.
[98] House Jour., 1870, 21.
[99] House Deb., 1870, 10.
[100] House Jour., 1870, 46.
[101] Committees were appointed to investigate if bribery had
been used in the appointment of officers of the Insane Asylum, the
sale of levee bonds, the school-money, the defalcation of the Land
Registrar, the councilmen of Jefferson City, the Metropolitan Police
Commissioners, and Board of Public Works.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account