Louisiana -- Politics and government -- 1865-1950; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Louisiana; Thesis (Ph. D.)
For the first time we hear the note of caution in regard to the
financial condition. The governor warned the Assembly that it was
not satisfactory and was such as to embarrass his administration. He
admitted that the credit of the State had not always been used for
practicable purposes, but insisted that under proper checks it might be
safely used to a still greater extent.[195] The usual expedients were
again resorted to: loans were negotiated to meet the interest due; and
the floating debt was provided for by the issue or exchange of fresh
bonds. But the same extravagance and folly which characterized their
actions in 1869 continued undiminished.[196]
By the session of 1870 an old feature of parliamentary tactics was
introduced: the opposition, though unavailing as to the final vote,
had become thoroughly organized for filibustering purposes and threats
of recourse to its use were held over the heads of the radicals as
a whip.[197] Mr. Lowell proposed once to make a bargain with his
party, to which he was opposed on a particular bill, by exchanging
his filibustering advantage for a grant of time.[198] By debates on
rules of order, appeals from the chair to the House, demands for the
roll-call on every little insignificant vote, they were able to waste
time and wear out their opponents until practically no business was
done at certain sessions.[199]
Four of the five measures which were destined to become the most
important of the session--indeed of the reconstruction period in
Louisiana--and the storm center about which the opposition to
the governor gathered, were, together with the appropriation and
revenue bills, introduced into the Senate as early as the third
day, thus gaining for that active body the questionable distinction
of initiative.[200] Nor did that body lose its zeal in pushing
legislation, for toward the close of the session bills went through
with a haste amazing even after the facility displayed on occasion in
1869. At a single evening session twenty bills were acted on,[201]
and yet, despite regular night sessions for about two weeks, the
session approached its close without concluding much important
legislation,[202] and without making provision for the revenues or
expenses of the government. And so, in accordance with the general
expectation,[203] the governor on March 3 notified the two houses of
the necessity to reassemble March 7 for ten days. In this extra session
the Assembly took up and passed the tremendous number of ninety-eight
bills, as compared with one hundred and seven in the first session.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account