Reconstruction in Louisiana after 1868 — John Shaqi
Reconstruction in Louisiana after 1868Lonn, Ella
History
Reconstruction in Louisiana after 1868
Lonn, Ella
Louisiana -- Politics and government -- 1865-1950; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Louisiana; Thesis (Ph. D.)
No less important to the State than its own political condition was
the attitude of the National government. The defeat of the Republican
party in the South in the fall election was like a dash of cold water.
To an indifference or even a desire to be rid of the whole subject of
reconstruction, which had characterized Congress in the fall of 1868,
succeeded a resolute purpose to take advantage of every opportunity
to gain an effective and permanent control for the Republican party.
Even the law passed during the session of 1868-9, which provided that
equal eligibility to office should inhere in those who had had their
disabilities removed by Congress and had taken the oath to support the
constitution in the act of July 11, 1868, was only a party measure to
win more firmly the scalawags,[27] as the list of pardons reveals the
fact that most had become Republicans.[28] Grant’s attitude was of
importance to a degree that Johnson’s was not, for he came into office
early in 1869, a popular and trusted executive, who would be free, to a
large extent, to direct the policy of the government in the South. But,
unfortunately for Louisiana, a brother-in-law, J. F. Casey, was soon
put in charge of the port there and so completely won Grant’s ear that
the latter approached Louisiana problems with a bias. Friction between
the State and National authorities was bound to come, for already at
the opening of 1869 the radicals had lost the respect of the army, and
recrimination was passing back and forth between the military commander
and the executive of the State.[29]
Socially, the problem was largely a race question, though the
bitterness of feeling toward her conquerors and contempt of
carpet-bagger and scalawag enter to complicate the matter. The
intensity of her bitterness toward the North found expression in such
paragraphs as the following:
The black and bloody chapter of American subjugation reads so much
like the scenes of the Netherlands and the Palatinate that it cannot
claim even the vile merit of distinguished infamy. Let it be blotted
out and closed. Let the American government publish and execute this
amnesty in good faith. Let them seek new fields of glory and cease to
promote men merely because they have distinguished themselves by the
slaughter of Americans or by laying waste the regions that Americans
have planted.[30]
In moments of calmness appeals to the better sentiment of the North
are heard, coupled with promises that a spirit of conciliation would
be seconded by the masses of the South, which were prepared to accept
all necessary and reasonable conditions imposed by the result of the
war.[31]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account