“If your time had permitted, I might have endeavoured to shew in what manner and degree the Assembly 1638, and those which followed after, as well as some which had preceded it half a century, contributed to the establishment of the highest and finest University education. Among the other great objects in which that Assembly so happily and successfully engaged, none was nearer their hearts, or better accomplished. It was their aim to establish all the Universities, Colleges, and Schools in a state of high efficiency; and, with this view, they reclaimed for the Church the power of visitation formerly exercised, that the religious character and consistent practice of all Principals, Regents, and Professors might be satisfactorily ascertained, as well as their aptitude for their stations; and that whatever was deficient might be supplied, and whatever was disordered or corrupt might be rectified. “For this difficult undertaking, the members of that Assembly were generally qualified in no ordinary degree. It has, indeed, been alleged that a large proportion of the elders consisted of illiterate men. I have seen it asserted in several books of late, even in some written by Presbyterians, that many of those in that Assembly, who judged of the gravest questions concerning theological learning and soundness in the faith, could neither read nor write. There is no authority for this insinuation, except the random assertion of Bishop Burnet—supposed sometimes to have been a contemporary, though he was not born for five years afterwards—the value of whose testimony on this matter may easily be estimated by any one who observes what he has confidently, though most ignorantly and erroneously, stated, with respect to Ruling Elders—that the mixture of that class with the Ministers in Church Courts was then quite a new thing; for, though such officers had formerly been allowed to interfere in parochial discipline, ‘yet they never came to their Assemblies till the year 1638.’ So far is this from being true, that, from the very first, Elders had convened in great numbers with the Ministers at the General Assemblies—there was even a preponderance of them in the earliest of all the Assemblies, in 1560—insomuch that, long before Burnet wrote, or even was born, several Bishops of Scotland, such as Adamson and Maxwell, had published complaints against decisions of the Assembly, on the ground that they had been carried by the votes of Lay Elders, as they called them. If the Elders were unable to read or write, so much the less credit is due to the system of education which had prevailed nearly forty years before 1638, under auspices not Presbyterian; and so much the greater credit should be given to the Presbyterians for the improvements by means of which, as Burnet frankly confesses, they brought the people generally to a most surprising measure of knowledge, particularly on theological points, and to a corresponding measure of practical piety.