Recreations in Astronomy: With Directions for Practical Experiments and Telescopic WorkWarren, Henry White
Religion
Recreations in Astronomy: With Directions for Practical Experiments and Telescopic Work
Warren, Henry White
Astronomy
It is not necessary for two observers to actually station themselves
at two distant parts of the earth in order to determine a parallax.
If an observer could go from one end of the base-line to the other,
he could determine both angles. Every observer is actually carried
along through space by two motions: one is that of the earth's
revolution of one thousand miles an hour around the axis; and the
other is the movement of the earth around the sun of one thousand
miles in a minute. Hence we can have the diameter not only of [Page
70] the earth (eight thousand miles) for a base-line, but the
diameter of the earth's orbit (184,000,000 miles), or any part of
it, for such a base. Two observers at the ends of the earth's
diameter, looking at a star at the same instant, would find that it
made the same angle at both ends; it has no parallax on so short a
base. We must seek a longer one. Observe a certain star on the 21st
of March; then let us traverse the realms of space for six months,
at one thousand miles a minute. We come round in our orbit to a
point opposite where we were six months ago, with 184,000,000 of
miles between the points. Now, with this for a base-line, measure
the angles of the same stars: it is the same angle. Sitting in my
study here, I glance out of the window and discern separate bricks,
in houses five hundred feet away, with my unaided eye; they subtend
a discernible angle. But one thousand feet away I cannot distinguish
individual bricks; their width, being only two inches, does not
subtend an angle apprehensible to my vision. So at these distant
stars the earth's enormous orbit, if lying like a blazing ring in
space, with the world set on its edge like a pearl, and the sun
blazing like a diamond in the centre, would all shrink to a mere
point. Not quite to a point from the nearest stars, or we should
never be able to measure the distance of any of them. Professor Airy
says that our orbit, seen from the nearest star, would be the same
as a circle six-tenths of an inch in diameter seen at the distance
of a mile: it would all be hidden by a thread one-twenty-fifth of an
inch in diameter, held six hundred and fifty feet from the eye. If a
straight line could be drawn from a star, Sirius in the east to the
star Vega in the west, touching our [Page 71] earth's orbit on one
side, as T R A (Fig. 28), and a line were to be drawn six months
later from the same stars, touching our earth's orbit on the other
side, as R B T, such a line would not diverge sufficiently from a
straight line for us to detect its divergence. Numerous vain
attempts had been made, up to the year 1835, to detect and measure
the angle of parallax by which we could rescue some one or more of
the stars from the inconceivable depths of space, and ascertain
their distance from us. We are ever impelled to triumph over what is
declared to be unconquerable. There are peaks in the Alps no man has
ever climbed. They are assaulted every year by men zealous of more
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account