Red Eagle and the Wars With the Creek Indians of Alabama.Eggleston, George Cary
History
Red Eagle and the Wars With the Creek Indians of Alabama.
Eggleston, George Cary
Creek War, 1813-1814; Weatherford, William, approximately 1780-1824
Peter McQueen was a shrewd fellow in his way, and he was not long in
discovering the weakness of the force which had followed him to the
creek. Rallying his men he gave them battle, and began pressing them
back. Colonel Caller, who was leading the advance, instead of ordering
his main body to the front, as a more experienced officer would have
done, determined to fall back upon them as a reserve. Dale, Smoot, and
Bailey could have maintained their position while waiting for the
reinforcements to come up, but when ordered to fall back upon the main
body, their brave but untrained and inexperienced men retreated rather
hastily. The men of the main body, having broken ranks to plunder, were
in no condition to resist panic, and seeing the advance companies
retreating, with the yelling Indians at their heels, they fled
precipitately. Caller, Dale, Bailey, and Smoot tried to rally them, but
succeeded only in getting eighty men into line. This small force,
commanded by their brave officers, made a desperate stand, and brought
the advancing savages to a halt. Dale was severely wounded, but he
fought on in spite of his suffering and his weakness. Finally, seeing
that they were overmatched and that their comrades had abandoned them
to their fate, the little band retreated, fighting as they went, until
at last the Indians abandoned the pursuit. Some of the Americans went
home, others became lost and were found, nearly dead with fatigue and
starvation, about a fortnight later.
Thus ended the battle of Burnt Corn. It was lost to the white men solely
by the misconduct of officers and men, but that misconduct was the
result of inexperience and a want of discipline, not of cowardice or any
lack of manhood.
The Indians were badly hurt. Their losses, though not known definitely,
are known to have been greater than those of the whites, of whom only
two were killed and fifteen wounded. They had lost their pack-horses,
and nearly all the fruits of their journey to Pensacola, so that they
were forced to return to that post to procure fresh supplies.
The affair was a much more serious disaster to the whites, however, than
at first appeared. The expedition had been undertaken for the purpose of
destroying McQueen's party, and thereby intimidating the war-inclined
Creeks. In that it had utterly failed. The Creeks were victors, though
they had suffered loss. Their victory encouraged them, and their losses
still further incensed them. The war which before was threatened was now
actually begun. The first battle had been fought, and others must follow
of necessity. The Creeks believed themselves to be able to exterminate
the whites, and they were now determined to do so.
In this determination they were strengthened not merely by the general
countenance given to them at Pensacola, but by very specific and urgent
advice from the British and Spanish officers there, who, as we learn
from official documents, urged the Creeks to make the war at once,
saying:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account