When the Levites were numbered it turned out that there were only 22,000;
but the number of the first-born males of the other tribes was 22,273.
The substitution, therefore, fell short by 273 persons. It clearly,
therefore, could be no type of the Lord Jesus, for there was no falling
short in Him. The result was that a supplement was necessary. Five
shekels of silver was to be added for each of the 273, and when that was
paid the whole of the first-born were redeemed. This money payment
afterwards became a permanent institution in Israel, and appears to have
been continued long after the original transaction was complete. In Num.
xviii. 16, we find the direction that ‘all that are to be redeemed . . .
shalt thou redeem . . . for the money of five shekels, after the shekel
of the sanctuary.’
Now in this Levitical picture there are many things that bear a close
resemblance to the Gospel. There was a clear legal claim, and the
remission of that claim by substitution, or the payment of a redemption
price. And this may serve to illustrate the claim which the law has on
us all, and the remission of the claim by the substitution of the Son of
God. But, as I have already said, we must be very careful how we call it
a type, for the contrasts are more remarkable than the resemblances.
There are two points of contrast to which I would draw your most especial
attention, points which I can scarcely doubt you have yourselves observed
already.
In the first place, the freedom or the release bestowed on the first-born
through redemption was the exact opposite of that bestowed on us through
the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. They were redeemed _from_ God;
but we are redeemed _to_ God, as we read Rev. v. 9, ‘Thou hast redeemed
us to God by thy blood, out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and
nation.’ Before they were redeemed, all the first-born were the Lord’s,
and were enrolled as a separate people belonging in a special and
peculiar manner to Him; so that He said of them, Num. iii. 13, ‘All the
first-born are mine.’ The effect of the redemption was to put an end to
this sacred relationship, and to place them on the same footing as the
other members of the family. It released them from all that was involved
in their being a peculiar people unto God. They ceased, in short, to be
a peculiar people. Now this is the exact reverse of the redemption that
is in Christ Jesus. The effect of His work is to call out a peculiar
people unto God, and so separate us unto Himself, that He may say of us,
as He said of the first-born, ‘All are mine.’ You remember how clearly
this is put in Titus, ii. 14, ‘Who gave himself for us.’ There is the
redemption price, and the next clause teaches the object of it, ‘that he
might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar
people, zealous of good works.’ Those, therefore, whom he has redeemed
are purified as ‘a peculiar people unto himself.’ We are brought by
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account