Reginald Bateman, Teacher and Soldier: A Memorial Volume of Selections from His Lectures and Other WritingsBateman, Reginald
History
Reginald Bateman, Teacher and Soldier: A Memorial Volume of Selections from His Lectures and Other Writings
Bateman, Reginald
Bateman, Reginald, 1884?-1918; English literature -- History and criticism; World War, 1914-1918
Thackeray produced a tremendous variety of characters, but the large
majority of them, I should say, are unpleasant. Thackeray, when all is
said and done, was first and last a moralist; and it was his aim as a
moralist to make his characters unpleasant. There are few lovable
characters in _Pendennis_; there are none in _Vanity Fair_. The few
respectable characters are all figure-heads, and as for the remainder,
if it were not for the humour and dramatic force with which they are
pictured to us, the description of such people as Becky Sharp, Sir Pitt
Crawley, Lord Steyne, and Jos. Sedley could give little pleasure. As
it is, one feels that outside the pages of Thackeray one would give a
good deal to avoid meeting them. But who would not give his dearest
possession for the privilege of beholding in the flesh Sam Weller, Mr.
Micawber, Sairey Gamp, Mr. Dick, and even such unmitigated scoundrels
as Jingle and Squeers. There are in Dickens many sorts of characters,
but only one sort is great--the characters whom Dickens himself found
amusing. The characters he admired, such as Nicholas, are wooden; the
characters he hated are too hateful; but the characters, whether
pleasant or unpleasant, in whom he found something amusing are all at
least interesting. Those whom he found amusing and at the same time
lovable are his greatest characters.
The persons in Dickens's pages whom I call his _great_ characters are
frequently accused of being impossible. You might as well say that a
hippopotamus or a duck-billed platypus is impossible because it does
not suit your ideas of what is right and proper. The existence of the
hippopotamus is its justification, and it is so also with a Dickens
character. It is obviously not copied, nor is it a mere abstraction.
It is vividly alive. _You_ could not have created it, and you know
that nobody else but Dickens could. I think it quite possible that a
very clever man might produce a Colonel Newcome, or a Blanche Amory, or
even a Becky Sharp; but I assert that no one but Dickens could produce
a Sairey Gamp or a Mr. Toots, and that nobody would be mad enough to
try.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account