Reginald Bateman, Teacher and Soldier: A Memorial Volume of Selections from His Lectures and Other WritingsBateman, Reginald
History
Reginald Bateman, Teacher and Soldier: A Memorial Volume of Selections from His Lectures and Other Writings
Bateman, Reginald
Bateman, Reginald, 1884?-1918; English literature -- History and criticism; World War, 1914-1918
Dickens's characters are improbable, that I grant you. But any man
with a marked individuality is improbable. It is all the people in the
world to one against his being what he is. Dickens's characters are
just a little more improbable, that is all. Dickens's work is called
by Chesterton rather mythology than history or fiction, the mythology
of the lower middle class. Micawber and Pecksniff, like Falstaff and
Lear, Hector and Achilles, are immortal realities, an undying
possession of humanity. Their alleged _impossibility_ is, in fact,
their passport to immortality. Thackeray's exact copies of life may
grow faded and out of date; but Dickens's creations will never be any
more impossible than when he created them. They will never be too
impossible for our acceptance. The glories of a Toots and a Swiveller
were veiled from the eyes of Thackeray. If he could have conceived
such characters, he would have exposed their weaknesses (an easy task),
and covered them with ridicule and contempt. But as depicted by the
kindly hand of Dickens, who is not ready to own them as fellow
creatures and admit that they are lovable?
The mention of Pecksniff reminds me that Dickens is sometimes accused
of merely attaching a label to his characters, of making them living
embodiments of some trait or peculiarity; in other words, that Dickens,
like Ben Jonson, made his characters mere illustrations of some
particular humour. Thus Mark Tapley may be designated by the word
"jolly," Micawber will always be "hoping for something to turn up,"
Pecksniff will always be playing the hypocrite. But though Pecksniff
is first and foremost a hypocrite, and though Dickens's purpose is
undoubtedly to impress on us and exaggerate his hypocrisy, he has all
the other essentials of a human being. He can, for example, get drunk.
Let me read a few extracts from that marvellous scene from _Martin
Chuzzlewit_ when Mr. Pecksniff gets tipsy at Todgers' Boarding House.
If any one, after reading it, can still assert that it is an
abstraction or impossible, I give him up in despair.
The gentlemen, after the toasts have been drunk, rejoin the ladies:
Mr. Pecksniff had followed his younger friends up-stairs and taken a
chair at the side of Mrs. Todgers. He had also spilt a cup of coffee
over his legs without appearing to be aware of the circumstance; nor
did he seem to know that there was muffin on his knee.
"And how have they used you down-stairs, sir?" asked the hostess.
"Their conduct has been such, my dear madam," said Mr. Pecksniff, "as I
can never think of without emotion, or remember without a tear. Oh,
Mrs. Todgers!"
"My goodness!" exclaimed the lady. "How low you are in your spirits,
sir!"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account