This report is very correct, so far as it goes; but the reporter might have added, that I told the Magistrates I had a volume of documents in my possession to prove Church to be a most infamous culprit, and that it was a disgrace to the moral character of the nation, to suffer such a man to be a minister of the Gospel. I have now a short comment to make on this occasion. I am still at a loss to know what complaint it was that Shawe intended to prefer against me. I had committed no riot, nor did I ever mix in any crowd, (in fact there was no crowd or noise, except what the associates of Church had created). Did he mean to complain to the Magistrates of the publication in my paper? If so, he must be grossly ignorant of law, not to know, that the magistrates for the county of Surrey could take no cognizance of that which I published in the city of London. And if they had, did he imagine that I would enter into any such recognizance as Mr. Theodore Page, the printer, in Blackfriars road, was obliged to do? No, Sir; so long as I continue to live in a free country, I will suffer no Justice of peace to lay an _illegal imprimatur_ on my press. Mr. Page, as quiet and discreet a man as ever existed, who was not seen in any crowd, and who would be the first to get away from any place where there happened to be the slightest disturbance, is now bound in the penalty of 100l. to preserve the peace! and for what, because he printed some hand-bills, giving an account of Church’s infamous practices. And now, reader, mark again the conduct of this _immaculate_ preacher. He adopts no course of proceeding, by which he may be enabled to falsify the accusations made against him. No,—he wants to crush and smother everything by violence; and still continue to levy contributions on some poor fools who go to hear him; or, perhaps, occasionally to convert his conventicle into an _accommodating shop_ for the _use_ of others.