Reminiscences of the King of Roumania — John Shaqi
Reminiscences of the King of RoumaniaKremnitz, Mite
History
Reminiscences of the King of Roumania
Kremnitz, Mite
Carol I, King of Romania, 1839-1914; Eastern question (Balkan); Jews -- Romania; Romania -- History -- Charles I, 1866-1914
A band of one hundred and fifty Bulgarians assembled in Roumanian
territory and crossed the Danube on July 16 near Petroschani,
abetted by a farmer, who concealed their rifles on an island
in midstream. Aided by the Bulgarians south of the river, the
insurrection spread rapidly, until Midhat Pacha defeated the rebels
at Letzwitza. A proclamation of the provisional government of the
Balkans was found among them, calling the Bulgarians to shake off
the Turkish yoke and found a Bulgarian kingdom. With barbarous
severity Midhat Pacha thereupon ordered all prisoners to be executed
in their native villages as a deterrent to the remainder of the
population. The Roumanian Government was accused of fomenting the
insurrection, or at least of having taken no steps to prevent the
congregation of insurgents on Roumanian territory; but the real
culprits were proved to have been Russian instigators. Prince
Charles refers to the incident as follows, in a letter to his father:
"The insurrection appears to be wholly suppressed for the
present, and the few insurgents still remaining in Bulgaria
have retired to the Balkans. How long the peace will remain
undisturbed I cannot say; but the fact remains that the
bitter feeling of the Bulgarians has reached its climax, and
can only be compared to religious fanaticism. Numerous bands
of insurgents are still on Roumanian territory, but we are
forcing them to disperse. Much anxiety is caused by guarding our
extended frontier."... "Public works have now come to the front:
a law has been formulated and passed by the Chamber that each
Roumanian shall work three days or pay for three days' labour in
the year on the roads of the country. This measure was at first
opposed, as it was considered a _corvée_, but we succeeded in
refuting this argument.... I fully realise your advice, that my
chief aim must be directed to the development of the material
interests of the country. I should prefer to leave politics
severely alone, and cut myself off from the rest of the world
for some time to come, but the foreign Powers will not permit
it. France in particular is attempting to throw difficulties
in my way; the Marquis de Moustier desires at all costs to fix
some quarrel on Roumania and to turn out my Ministry, which no
longer inspires confidence in _France_; for this I am sorry;
but, nevertheless, it will not induce me to dismiss a Ministry
which possesses _my_ entire confidence. I forgot to mention
that Bourée, _à propos_ of the Bulgarian incident, expressed
the opinion: 'This circumstance must be utilised to demand the
fall of the Roumanian Ministry.' I think it more important to
change the Ministers in France than in Roumania--the events
in Paris, in the Sorbonne, the Rochefort trial in consequence
of the violent article in the _Lanterne_, &c., are ominous
portents.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account