Report of the Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877: Read in the Senate and House of Representatives May 23, 1878Pennsylvania. General Assembly. Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877
History
Report of the Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877: Read in the Senate and House of Representatives May 23, 1878
Pennsylvania. General Assembly. Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877
A. I telegraphed to the chief, in town, from the Twelfth ward station,
that things were at a stand-still; that there was no attempt on the
part of the railroad men to run out trains, and that the men were still
stationed at the crossing, and he instructed me to place the men in
charge of officer Fowler, and to come in to the central office. I did
so after three o'clock.
Q. Did you go out again?
A. Not that afternoon.
Q. Did you receive any further instructions?
A. Not that day. The men remained there that day and night--all night.
Q. Were you present when Mr. Watt came to consult with the mayor?
A. I was in the office.
Q. Did you hear the conversation?
A. No.
Q. What did Mr. Watt tell you that time in the presence of the mayor?
A. I do not think the mayor was present at that time. It was in regard
to what I was going out there for. He told me a few of the men were on
a strike, and that they would probably undertake to interfere with the
running of the trains, but he did not anticipate any serious trouble.
He thought that a few men would be sufficient. He did not think it
would amount to anything, and said that the presence of a few men would
stop the whole thing. He looked on it very lightly at that time.
Q. After Mr. Watt went away it was that Mayor McCarthy gave you
instructions?
A. Yes.
Q. What did he tell you to do?
A. He told me to collect as many men as I could get.
Q. Of the force on duty?
A. There was no force on duty.
Q. From what source were you to collect them?
A. He told me to get as many men as I could get. He meant the office
men. But they were only on duty at night, and at this time none of them
were about except the chief of detectives, Mr. O'Mara, who was busy, I
believe. I so reported to the mayor. I told him I could get a number of
the men who were dropped from the rolls. He told me to go ahead and get
them.
Q. How many of those men were there then?
A. I suppose there may have been twenty or twenty-five.
Q. You selected ten of them?
A. I thought that would be a sufficient number on account of what Mr.
Watt had told me.
Q. You could have got more if you had wanted them?
A. Yes; I did get more afterwards. I think ten more came out. Of course
we could not get those men and bring them into service as our men in
actual service, because those men had been dropped from the rolls, and
it was only those willing to go on duty or not.
Q. But plenty of them were willing to go?
A. Yes; they showed a willingness to go.
Q. When you got to Twenty-eighth street, how many men were engaged
there then in preventing the trains from moving?
A. The first intimation I had of any men, who were going to prevent
trains from running, was when Mr. Watt was assaulted, and then I should
judge that those men actively engaged, numbered, probably, ten or
fifteen--that seemed to be the leaders.
Q. When you undertook to arrest McCall, how many men took his part?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account