Neither, in our opinion, was his Majesty induced to enter into engagements with the Indians for fixing a more _precise_ and determinate boundary "_partly from a consideration of justice, in regard to legal titles to lands_,"--for there were _none_ such (as we shall prove) comprehended within the tract _now_ under consideration. But for a full comprehension of ALL the reasons for his Majesty's "entering into engagements with the Indians, for fixing a more precise and determinate boundary line," than was settled by the royal proclamation of Oct. 1763, we shall take the liberty of stating the following facts:--In the year 1764, the King's ministers had it _then_ in contemplation, to obtain an act of parliament for the proper regulation of the Indian commerce; and providing a fund, (by laying a duty on the trade) for the support of superintendants, commissaries, interpreters, &c. at particular forts in the Indian country, _where_ the trade was to be carried on:--And as a part of this system, it was thought proper, in order to avoid future complaints from the Indians, on account of encroachments on their hunting grounds, to purchase a large tract of territory from them, and establish, with their consent, a respectable _boundary line_, beyond which his Majesty's subjects should _not_ be permitted to settle. In consequence of this system, orders were transmitted to Sir William Johnson, in the year 1764, to call together the Six Nations,--lay this proposition of the _boundary_ before them, and take their opinion upon it.--This, we apprehend, will appear evident from the following speech, made by Sir William to the Six Nations, at a conference which he held with them, at Johnson Hall, May the 2d, 1765. BRETHREN,