Freed persons; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877); Southern States -- Politics and government -- 1865-1950
People who will do these things, after such a war, and so much misery,
while federal bayonets are yet around them, are not to be intrusted with
the education and development of a, race of slaves just liberated.
I have made this letter longer than it should have been, and may have
taxed your patience, yet I do not see how I could have said less, and
expressed my views on the subject.
I am, general, very respectfully, your obedient servant,
SAMUEL THOMAS,
Colonel, Assistant Commissioner B.R.F. and A.L.
for Mississippi and N.E. Louisiana.
General CARL SCHURZ.
No. 28.
Mobile, Alabama, _September_ 9, 1865.
Colonel George D. Robinson, 97th United States colored troops, states as
follows:
I was sent out to Connecuh, Covington, Coffee, Dale, and Henry counties,
to administer the amnesty oath. I was at Covington myself, having officers
under my orders stationed in the other four counties. I travelled through
Connecuh and Covington; about the other counties I have reports from my
officers. A general disposition was found among the planters to set the
colored people who had cultivated their crops during the summer adrift as
soon as the crops would be secured, and not to permit the negro to remain
upon any footing of equality with the white man in that country.
In none of the above-named counties I heard of a justice of the peace or
other magistrate discharging the duties of an agent of the Freedmen's
Bureau, nor did I hear of any of them willing to do so. I deem it
necessary that some officers be sent out there to attend to the interests
of the freedmen, in order to avoid the trouble and confusion which is
almost certain to ensue unless the matter is attended to and regulated.
I returned from Covington yesterday, September 8.
GEO. D. ROBINSON,
_Colonel 97th United States Infantry_.
No. 29.
MEMORANDUM OF A CONVERSATION BETWEEN WILLIAM KING, ESQ., OF SAVANNAH, AND
CARL SCHURZ.
Savannah, July 31, 1865.
Question by Mr. Schurz. What are the ideas of the people in this State as
to the future organization of your labor system?
Answer. It is generally conceded that slavery is dead, but it is believed
that the negro will not work unless compelled to. Money is no inducement
that will incite him to work. He works for comfort, that is, he wants to
gain something and then enjoy it immediately afterwards. He has no idea of
the binding force of a contract, and it is questionable whether he ever
will have.
Question. So you consider the contract system, as it is now introduced
here and there, a failure.
Answer. In a number of cases that I know of it is a failure. The negroes
are not doing the work they have contracted for. I know other cases in
which they have remained with their former masters, work well, and produce
fair crops.
Question. In what manner, then, can, in your opinion, the free-labor
system be made to work here?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account