Report on the geology of the Henry MountainsGilbert, Grove Karl
Science
Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains
Gilbert, Grove Karl
Geology -- Utah -- Henry Mountains; Intrusions (Geology) -- Utah -- Henry Mountains
A description of the structure of the mountain must include, first, the
arch of the strata; second, the faults which modify the arch; third, the
system of trachyte dikes and trachyte sheets; and fourth, the sculpture
of the mountain. In its general proportions the arch is at once simple
and symmetrical. From all sides the strata rise, slowly at first, but
with steadily increasing rate, until the angle of 45° is reached. Then
the dip as steadily diminishes to the center, where it is nothing. A
model to exhibit the form of the dome would resemble a round-topped hat;
only the level rim would join the side by a curve instead of an angle,
and the sides would not be perpendicular, but would flare rapidly
outward (see Figure 11). The base of the arch is not circular, but is
slightly oval, the long diameter being one-third greater than the short.
The length of the uplift is a little more than four miles; the width a
little more than three miles, and the height about 5,000 feet. The
curvature fades away so gradually at its outer limit that it is not easy
to tell where it ends, and the horizontal dimensions assigned to the
dome are no more than rude approximations. But there is another element
which can be given more exactly. The line of maximum dip, which
separates the convex upper portion of the dome from the concave
periphery, is easily traced out in nature, and runs at the foot of the
steep part of the mountain. It surrounds an area two miles in width and
two and two-thirds miles in length.
[Illustration:
FIG. 11A.—View from the west spur of Mount Ellsworth, showing the
trachyte dikes of the north spur and revetments of sandstone and
trachyte.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 11.—Stereogram of Mount Ellsworth; an ideal restoration of the
form of the overarching strata.
]
The Ellsworth arch is almost but not completely isolated. The Holmes
arch, upon the east side, stands so near that the bases of the two
impinge and coalesce, and the same thing happens, though less notably,
with the Hillers arch at the north.
The simplicity of the arch is further impaired by faults—not great
faults dividing the whole uplift, but a system of small displacements
which are themselves subordinate phenomena of the uplift. They are
restricted to the central portion, and never occur so low down as the
line of maximum dip. The strata of the upper part of the arch are
divided into a number of prismoid blocks which stand at slightly
different levels but are not sufficiently deranged to destroy the
general form of the arch. The greatest throw is only a few hundred feet.
All or nearly all of the fault planes are occupied by dikes of trachyte.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account