Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains — John Shaqi
Report on the geology of the Henry MountainsGilbert, Grove Karl
Science
Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains
Gilbert, Grove Karl
Geology -- Utah -- Henry Mountains; Intrusions (Geology) -- Utah -- Henry Mountains
Mount Pennell is not so easily studied as the lower mountains at the
south. Its summits are timbered and are carved into alpine forms which
do not portray the structure but rather mask it. Upon its flanks however
the topography and the structure are in so close sympathy that the
latter is easily read; and by their study some of the general features
of the mountain have been made out. From the east and south and west the
strata can be seen to rise toward it. The uprising strata on the west
are the Tununk sandstone and the shales above and below it. The
sandstone forms no revetments, but accords so closely in its dips with
the slopes of the mountain that it is the surface rock over a broad
area, outcropping wherever there is rock exposure. At the head of the
foot-slope trachyte sheets are associated with it, some overlying and
others underlying it; and at one point a gorge reveals a laccolite not
far below it—a laccolite that may or may not be the great nucleus of the
mountain. On the west and south flanks the uprising strata are the Blue
Gate and Tununk sandstones, with their shales. The Gate sandstone has
been worn away nearly to the foot of the slope, and forms a monoclinal
ridge circling about the base. The ridge is interrupted by a number of
waterways, and it sends salients well up upon the flank, but it is too
continuous to be regarded as a mere line of revetments. The Tununk
sandstone is not to be seen without search, being covered by heavy
trachyte sheets. Trachyte sheets also underlie it, and the whole are
carved into a conspicuous series of revet-crags.
[Illustration:
FIG. 36.—Mount Pennell, from the north.
]
The association of overarching strata with sheets of trachyte leaves no
doubt in my mind that the core of Mount Pennell is laccolitic, but
whether it is simple or compound is not so clear. The collation of all
the observed dips shows that if there be but one laccolite it has not
the simplicity of form which usually characterizes them.
There are low arches of the strata at the southern, northern, and
northeastern bases, which reveal no trachyte and give the impression
that there may be a foundation of low-lying laccolites upon which the
main trachyte mass or masses of the mountain are based. One of these low
arches, that at the northeast, is shown in the foreground of Figure 36.
The strata which portray it are of the Henry’s Fork conglomerate, and
the laccolite which they cover is of necessity distinct from that which
is revealed on the east flank of the mountain.
[Illustration:
FIG. 37.—Sentinel Butte.
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account