Report on the geology of the Henry MountainsGilbert, Grove Karl
Science
Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains
Gilbert, Grove Karl
Geology -- Utah -- Henry Mountains; Intrusions (Geology) -- Utah -- Henry Mountains
Not so the _Marvine laccolite_. Lying at the foot of the mountain where
erosion is so conditioned as to discriminate between hard and soft, and
surrounded by nothing firmer than the Tununk shale and Tununk sandstone,
it has suffered a rapid denudation, in which nearly the whole of its
cover has been carried away without seriously impairing its form. It
stands forth on a pedestal, devoid of talus, naked and alone. The upper
surface undulates in low waves preserving the original form as it was
impressed on the molten mass. Over a portion there is a thin coating of
sandstone, the layer next to the trachyte being saved from destruction
by the induration acquired during the hot contact. From the remainder
this also has disappeared, and the contact face of the trachyte is bare.
For some reason the exterior portion of the laccolite disintegrates more
slowly than the interior. It may be that there was some reaction from
the surrounding sedimentaries during the cooling, which modified the
crystallization. Or it may be that at a later epoch a reciprocal
metamorphism was induced along the contact of the diverse rocks. At all
events there is a crust a few feet in thickness which is specially
qualified to resist destructive agents, and which by this peculiarity
can be distinguished from the trachyte of the interior. All about the
northern and western faces, which are steep, this crust has been broken
through and the interior excavated; but it is only along the upper edge
of the face that the crust is completely destroyed. Along the lower edge
it is preserved in remnants sufficiently numerous to fully define the
outline of the base. Each remnant is a sort of revet-crag standing
nearly vertical and joined by a buttress to the cliff behind it. In the
accompanying sketches (Figures 43 and 44) the most of these features
find better expression than words can give them. The solemn order of the
tombstone-like revetments is not exaggerated, nor is the contrast
between the ruggedness of the cliff and the smoothness of the upper
crust. At the left in the upper view, and at the right in the lower,
there can be seen inclined strata, the remnants of the arch which once
covered the whole.
The extreme depth of the laccolite is 1,200 feet, and its diameters are
6,000 and 4,000 feet.
_The G arch_, the Dana, the Crescent, and the Maze agree in having no
visible laccolites. They are mere dome-like uplifts, by which inferior
beds are brought to light. In the middle of the Crescent arch, and there
only, is a small dike. They differ in their dimensions and in their
erosion and topography. The G arch is low and broad, and lifts the
Henry’s Fork conglomerate a few hundred feet only. It is covered by that
bed except where Bowl Creek and one or two others cross it in shallow
cañons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account