Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains — John Shaqi
Report on the geology of the Henry MountainsGilbert, Grove Karl
Science
Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains
Gilbert, Grove Karl
Geology -- Utah -- Henry Mountains; Intrusions (Geology) -- Utah -- Henry Mountains
Figure 49 is a view of the east flank of Mount Ellen, as seen from Mount
Hillers. It groups together many of the details that have been
enumerated. The conical hill at the left is the Scrope laccolite. The
spur from the mountain which ends just at the right of it is the Peale
laccolite. The bold butte which terminates the last spur of the mountain
in the distance is the Jukes laccolite. Across the base of the latter
one can trace the outcrop of a hard bed. This is the Henry’s Fork
conglomerate, and the upward curve which it shows belongs (probably) to
the Crescent arch. Nearer than the Jukes Butte and in the same direction
is a low hill, marking the dike within the Crescent. Just to the left of
it is an insular outcrop of the conglomerate, and nearer by is another
outcrop in the form of a cliff, which is continuous to the base of the
Peale laccolite. Between the Peale and Scrope laccolites the
conglomerate is hidden by an embayment of the cliff, and it reappears in
the base of the Scrope Butte. In all these outcrops the escarpments of
conglomerate face toward the east and at the same time toward the Maze
and Crescent arches. On the opposite side of the arches the same
conglomerate outcrops in a monoclinal ridge with its escarpment facing
to the west. The ridge can be traced in the sketch from a point in the
foreground under the Jukes Butte nearly to the eastern base of the
butte, the course at first being almost directly toward the butte and
then curving far to the right and forming the Crescent. Between the
Scrope and Peale laccolites on one side and the monoclinal ridge on the
other, lie the Maze and the Maze arch. Beyond the Maze arch and limited
at the right by the Crescent, is the Crescent arch. The Scrope, the
Peale, and the Jukes are visible laccolites; the Maze and Crescent
arches cover invisible laccolites.
The determinate laccolites and arches which compose the lower slopes of
Mount Ellen, while they are of prime importance for purposes of
investigation, must not be considered superior in number and magnitude
to those of the central region. That region is known to abound in
trachyte masses, and it far exceeds the marginal district in the extent
and degree of its metamorphism. There is every reason to believe that
the mountain crest marks the zone of greatest igneous activity, and that
the foot-hills are as truly subsidiary from a geological point of view
as they are from a topographic. There is no evidence of a great central
laccolite, such as the Hillers and Pennell clusters possess, and I am
disposed to regard the mountain as a great congeries of trachyte masses
of moderate size, separated and in the main covered by shales and
sandstones. The sedimentary strata of the summits are all of the
Cretaceous series, but they are too greatly altered to permit the
discrimination of the Masuk, Gate, and Tununk groups. The Henry’s Fork
conglomerate, which might have been recognized even in a metamorphic
condition, was not seen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account