Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains — John Shaqi
Report on the geology of the Henry MountainsGilbert, Grove Karl
Science
Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains
Gilbert, Grove Karl
Geology -- Utah -- Henry Mountains; Intrusions (Geology) -- Utah -- Henry Mountains
CHAPTER IV.
THE LACCOLITE.
The principal facts in regard to the laccolites of the Henry Mountains
having been set forth in the preceding chapter, an attempt will now be
made to deduce from them the natural history of the Laccolite.
There is a question which the critical geologist will be likely to
propound, and which should be answered at the outset. “What evidence”,
he may demand, “is there that the origin of the laccolite was subsequent
to the formation of the inclosing strata rather than contemporaneous
with it? May it not have been buried instead of intruded? May not the
successive sheets and masses of trachyte have been spread or heaped by
eruption upon the bottoms of Mesozoic seas, and successively covered by
the accumulating sediments?” The answer is not difficult.
1st. No fragment of the trachyte has been discovered in the associated
strata. The constitution of the several members of the Mesozoic system
in the Henry Mountain region does not differ from the general
constitution of the same members elsewhere. This evidence is of a
negative character, but if there were no other it would be sufficient.
For there is indubitable proof that at the end of the Shinarump period
the Henry Mountain region was lifted above the ocean, and if any of the
nuclei of the mountains had then existed they could not have escaped
erosion by shore waves, and must have modified the contemporaneous
deposits.
2d. The trachyte is in no case vesicular, and in no case fragmental. If
it had been extruded on dry land or in shallow water, where the pressure
upon it was not sufficient to prevent the dilatation of its gases, it
would have been more or less inflated, after the manner of recent lavas.
If it had issued at the bottom of an ocean, the rapidity of cooling
would have cracked the surface of the flow while the interior was yet
molten and in motion, and breccias of trachyte _débris_ would have
resulted. The absence of inflation and of brecciation are of course of
the nature of negative evidence, but they derive weight from the fact
that a great number of distinct bodies of trachyte have been examined in
the course of the investigation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account