Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, First Part: Porulosa (Spumellaria and Acantharia): Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIIIHaeckel, Ernst
Science
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, First Part: Porulosa (Spumellaria and Acantharia): Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII
Haeckel, Ernst
Radiolaria
107. _Perigenous and Centrogenous Skeletons._--Much more important than the
topographical relation of the skeleton to the central capsule, according to
which the Ectolithia and Entolithia are separated from each other (§ 106),
is the original development of the skeleton within or without the central
capsule, which gives rise to the distinction between perigenous and
centrogenous skeletons. _Centrogenous skeletons_ are found only in the
ACANTHARIA, which are further distinguished from all other Radiolaria by
their skeleton being formed of acanthin; in all ACANTHARIA the formation of
the skeleton begins in the middle of the central capsule, from which twenty
(the number is inconstant only in the {lxxiii}small group #Actinelida#)
radial spines are centrifugally developed. The three other legions, on the
contrary, possess on the whole a _perigenous_ skeleton, which _originally_
develops outside the central capsule and never in its middle. In the
NASSELLARIA and PHÆODARIA the skeleton retains this extracapsular position,
as also in the #Beloidea# and part of the #Sphærellaria# among the
SPUMELLARIA; in the great majority of the latter, however, the primary
perigenous skeleton is subsequently enveloped by the growing central
capsule, so that it lies partially within it (§ 109).
108. _Polyphyletic Origin of the Skeleton._--The skeleton of the Radiolaria
has undoubtedly originated polyphyletically, for it is impossible to derive
its manifold varieties from a single ground-form, or to regard them as
modifications of one type. It is much more probable that the different
skeletonless Radiolaria have entered upon different ways of skeleton
formation quite independently of each other. At the outset it is quite
clear that the skeletons of the _four legions have originated independently
of each other_. Further, it is certain that within the legion of the
SPUMELLARIA the Beloid skeletons of the #Collodaria# are not connected with
the Sphæroid skeletons of the #Sphærellaria# and the forms derived from
them (see § 109). In the same way the skeletons of the PHÆODARIA are
polyphyletic; probably in this legion the Beloid, Sphæroid, Cyrtoid, and
Conchoid skeletons have been developed quite independently (see § 112). In
the NASSELLARIA, on the other hand, it is possible that all the skeletal
forms are to be derived monophyletically from a single simple primitive
form (either the sagittal ring or basal tripod?) (see § 111). Still more
probable is it that the ACANTHARIA have arisen monophyletically, for all
the forms of their acanthin skeleton may be derived without violence from
_Actinelius_ (see § 110).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account